http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1345
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-20-06 05:48 -------
Reporter, can you please resubmit the info? Unfortunately bugzilla ate the
descriptions.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-20-06 05:47 -------
Unfortunately this is more like a CANTFIX - waiting for vertical blank requires
kernel level support that currently does not exist, as far as I'm aware.
Certainly it'd be good if it did, simply for increased smoothness of XFree, but
this is not really a bug Wine can resolve.
If there is a kernel bugzilla bug about exposing vsync signals to user space
applications, this would depend on it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-20-06 05:44 -------
Resolving invalid, this function is only useful for increasing efficiency on SMP
systems by avoiding a call to WaitForSingleObject. It makes no difference on
uniprocessor systems, and is useful only for locks that experience high levels
of contention.
If anything, I'd say this fixme should be turned into a comment. The amount of
spew it generates can be large, and I can't see it being implemented anytime
soon, there are too many more important things.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-20-06 05:35 -------
Hi Ed, could you try this patch please?
--- olefont.c.old 2003-06-20 11:33:06.000000000 +0100
+++ olefont.c 2003-06-20 11:33:11.000000000 +0100
@@ -304,10 +304,11 @@
if (ppvObj==0)
return E_POINTER;
- *ppvObj = 0;
-
if (lpFontDesc == 0)
return NO_ERROR; /* MSDN Oct 2001 */
+
+ *ppvObj = 0;
+
/*
* Try to construct a new instance of the class.
Apply it with `patch -p0 </path/to/patch` in the wine/dlls/oleaut32 directory.
See if that fixes the problem.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-20-06 04:51 -------
can you run it again with --debugmsg +ole,+relay this time?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-20-06 04:43 -------
partially true.
you sometimes cannot drop in windows dlls though, for instance
our ddraw.dll could not work with windows gdi.
but review might be possible and needed
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-20-06 04:37 -------
judging from last comment it is fixed, so why is the bug "reopened"?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2003-20-06 04:35 -------
this is not a bugreport?
what is broken?
these messages do not point to brokenness as is.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.