http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2108
Summary: Delphi stdvcl40.dll file not initialized from COM object
Product: Wine
Version: 20031212
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-ole
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: eetasoft(a)online.ee
Delphi stdvcl40.dll file not initialized from COM object
To reproduce:
1. Save the attached testcase files to some directory.
2. Run
wine test
Observed result:
Program Error
Member FSPECARGS does not evaluate to an object
Expected result:
Result: 0
Andrus.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2104
------- Additional Comments From phil(a)mail.ru 2004-18-03 13:31 -------
Later versions of The Bat! don't have this problem in Wine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
Summary: fixme:thunk:CommonUnimpStub generic stub: ?
Product: Wine
Version: 20040309
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-winelib
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: mandreiana(a)yahoo.com
Trying to install ie6. At 65% it stalls, with this message repeating in terminal:
fixme:thunk:CommonUnimpStub generic stub: ?
Please fix :D
Note: Leaving the Severity to normal, though it might be minor. I think it would
be better if wine will focus on several critical applications (MS Office, MS
Access, I Explorer, Adobe Photoshop) and make sure they work in each release.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1769
mandreiana(a)yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
------- Additional Comments From mandreiana(a)yahoo.com 2004-18-03 08:06 -------
Confirming this (compiled wine 20040309, ran ./configure without any options )
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2086
------- Additional Comments From feulner.norbert(a)web.de 2004-18-03 05:08 -------
I have now made a regression test, and found
out that the problem is caused by a change
made to objects/dib.c of vers. 20031016.
I have sent a bugfix.
Regards Norbert
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2106
Summary: segfault in folder dialog box (or support for
lpBrowseInfo->pszDisplayName=NULL in SHBrowseForFolder)
Product: Wine
Version: 20040309
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-gui
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: sylvain.pasche(a)switzerland.org
I had some applications segfaulting when displaying the folder selection
dialog box. I looked around in the sources, and I found a previous patch
posted by woschwot_at_onlinehome.de which solves this problem:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/03/0141.html
So I looked in the cvs with cvsweb, but it appears not to be commited yet. So I
open this bug to keep an eye on it
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
URL| |http://bugs.winehq.org/bugli
| |st.cgi?product=Wine&bug_file
| |_loc_type=substring&bug_file
| |_loc=http%3A%
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2004-17-03 23:21 -------
Well Jeremy Has opened up the code for the AppDB so that helps
So Here is my thoughts at the moment.
The Problem of Integrateing these two databases is this.
1. when I am in the AppDB I would like a quick way to see all the bugs for this
app.
2. When am in Bugzilla I would like to have a quick way to see it has to say
about in the AppDB.
There is a URL Field in the Bugsilla database that is primarily used to point
to a place where you can download the app when the bug has the Keyword
Download. If we used this field to point to the Appdb then we have a link to
the app for the bug.
In the Appdb we can have a link that has a query to look for the url for this
app in the URL field in Bugzilla.
I have tried this out in theory using "The Bat: as an Example. In each of the
bugs in bugzilla I have entered the URL for the bat
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=68 in the URL Field.
When I use this Query in the URL of this bug I get all the bugs for the bat.
The biggest problem with this solution is that the URL will need to be changed
for all the existing bugs which is no small task. The second problem is
maintaining new bugs as they come into Bugzilla.
The first problem can only be overcome with a lot of hard (Grunt) work. There
are just over 2100 bugs in bugzilla at this time, so if 21 people were to take
a hundred bugs each I think we could be done in a about a week.
The second problem can be overcome only if we can use the AppDB to be a
frontend for submissions to bugzilla. I see that there are is at least one
person (besides myself and Jerry) willing to put some work into the AppDB so I
have at least a hope of this flying.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.