http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3545
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2005-11-10 08:16 -------
Please install wine-debug package/recompile your wine with debug insformation.
And please use latest wine version and retest your program.
Backtrace should show functions and their arguments, not dwords.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2624
richard(a)daijobu.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |julliard(a)codeweavers.com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|wine-gdi |wine-user
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |source
Summary|Bitmap doesn't get drawn in |In dialogs, an incorrect
|dialog box |extra WM_ERASEBKGND is sent
| |after WM_PAINT
Version|20041201 |CVS
------- Additional Comments From richard(a)daijobu.co.uk 2005-11-10 04:18 -------
Confirming. I'll attach a smaller testcase & some debug output.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3514
jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr 2005-11-10 02:43 -------
Good job. That works.
Thank for you answer
We have a new playable game with WINE.
Dave
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2547
------- Additional Comments From grog(a)grsu.by 2005-11-10 01:52 -------
Produces same errors with wine cvs dated 2005-10-06.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2362
------- Additional Comments From grog(a)grsu.by 2005-11-10 01:48 -------
Currently I have no possibility to install 5.0.12 here. However, I'll test this ASAP.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2351
------- Additional Comments From grog(a)grsu.by 2005-11-10 01:45 -------
Notes does NOT start with wine cvs dated 2005-10-06.
Something about threads.
The installation is the same where wine cvs 2004-11-29 (last known good to me) works.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3540
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.warblade.as/index
| |.asp
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Summary|wine-20050930 Warblade |Warblade installation
|install error |problems with comctl32
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-11-10 01:38 -------
The original problem was a richedit problem which is now fixed in CVS.
However, this game requires native comctl32 to install due to
"Folder not valid" errors... Whatever folder I select. (Simple to test,
just try to install. The programfolder dialog will not allow you to go
next, same for Startmenu Folder dialog.)
Using native comctl32 helps, but is not a solution.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3484
nospam(a)thenerdshow.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|IE6 font rendering broken on|IE6 font rendering broken on
|AMD64 wine >= 20050824 |AMD64 wine >= 20050823
| |04:38:50
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3114
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2005-11-10 00:07 -------
Please check that prelink is not installed. As it is enabled per default on FC3.
If it is installed - you have to reinstall whole system this time without prelink.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1918
------- Additional Comments From jbj(a)image.dk 2005-11-10 00:06 -------
There is a misunderstanding in Mike Hearns comment #4 (from 2004-01-02). The
way this is supposed to work (in all known windows versions, even 16 bit) is:
1. PostMessage places WM_CLOSE in the queue, no special treatment
2. GetMessage/DispatchMessage passes WM_CLOSE to the WindowProc, no special
treatment.
3. The WindowProc in the App does whatever it pleases, including deciding if it
wants to call DefWindowProc or not. In the sample this happens to be a call to
DestroyWindow, but anything goes. If WindowProc had contained code to pass the
message on to DefWindowProc, DefWindowProc would have called DestroyWindow too,
but DefWindowProc is not called in the sample. There is still no special
treatment. Some applications RELY on the ability to refuse WM_CLOSE by simply
doing nothing. For instance Notepad will invoke MessageBox (Save Yes/No/Cancel)
and do nothing if the user clicks cancel.
4. DestroyWindow is supposed to SendMessage(WM_DESTROY) as one of its last
actions, causing WindowProc to be invoked recursively to handle that message.
I suspect the original bug was that this did not happen correctly.
5. The samples WindowProc happens to call PostQuitMessage from its WM_DESTROY
case, but if the WindowProc is never called with WM_DESTROY due to a wine bug,
this doesn't happen.
6. If PostQuitMessage was actually called, the WM_QUIT message will end the
message loop once it trickles to the head of the queue. But if PostQuitMessage
was never called, this obviously won't happen.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544
Summary: Debian packages in wrong layout, and outdated
Product: Wine
Version: 20050725
Platform: PC
URL: http://wine.sourceforge.net/apt/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-ports
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: jbj(a)image.dk
The packages collection in Debian (.deb) format at http://www.sourceforge.net/apt/
cannot be installed directly because the index files and directory layout do not
follow the correct syntax, resulting in 404 http errors when trying to install them.
The apt installer system requires a specific layout of the directories below
whatever URL you choose (currently http://www.sourceforge.net/apt/), but
unfortunately this layout is not followed. Basically, the directory layout must
be the same as in the official Debian archives at
http://ftp.xx.debian.org/debian (replace xx by a country code such as de)
except that there will be a lot fewer programs (4 rather than 6000).
Additionally, the page at winehq.com describing how to configure your system to
use that apt package is all but useless: apt takes its configuration from a file
in a specific syntax, but you only provide a screen shot of how things might be
selected in one of the less popular GUI front ends. You need to provide the
correct line to place in /etc/apt/sources.list as this is the generic fact
common to all front ends. While you are at it, be sure to state the date when
the text of the page was last valid, so users are not left guessing if this page
applies to the situation in the year 2005 or in the year 2001.
And of cause the packages currently on the web page are 2 snapshots behind the
source release.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3537
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-user |wine-ole
Keywords| |NoAppDBEntry
Summary|"Microcal Origin 6.0 and |"Microcal Origin 6.0 and
|7.5" Insert Object Problems |7.5" Insert Object Problems
|with OFFICE 2000 Microsoft |with OFFICE 2000 Microsoft
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2349
curtis(a)curtis.hawthorne.name changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Version|20040615 |20050930
------- Additional Comments From curtis(a)curtis.hawthorne.name 2005-10-10 21:36 -------
Just tried it with a new version of Wine. I didn't run it through a lot of
different things, but those warnings are definitely gone. Thanks for the work!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3366
wine(a)troy.rollo.name changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |wine(a)troy.rollo.name
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3241
vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |3257, 3353, 3481, 3486, 3517
nThis| |
Severity|critical |blocker
Target Milestone|--- |0.9.0
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2005-10-10 21:25 -------
Raised severity yet again. This is a blocker for 0.9.0 The summary of the bug:
uxtheme changes made all themed controls unicode. This broke WM_GETTEXTLENGTH.
Now it returns double the size of the actual text length. Also programs that
expect to see their controls not being unicode get IsWindowUnicode(hwnd) == TRUE.
Author claims that this is the way Windows XP behaves. I have no means to verify
this but some how I don't think this is the case.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3366
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |major
Keywords| |regression
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2287
jonathan(a)ernstfamily.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From jonathan(a)ernstfamily.ch 2005-10-10 19:01 -------
De: Mark Douglas Nagy <m.d.nagy(a)worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:15:38 -0400 (lun, 03:15 CEST)
I've been having trouble connecting to bugs.winehq.org, but from what
I've seen of Wine 20050930 running on FC2 with the latest
fedoralegacy.org updates, the bug seems to have been fixed, either in
Wine or in Fedora or both.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3515
vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|wine-misc |wine-shdocvw
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3301
------- Additional Comments From willie(a)froq.net 2005-10-10 18:26 -------
Interesting. Maybe your problem comes from configuring Wine without OpenGL? It
bails out for me as well, using yesterdays CVS, but for a different reason: A
messagebox comes up, stating "Render Creation Error: "Unknown stencil mode
format."".
There are a lot of those two messages in the console:
err:d3d:IWineD3DImpl_IsGLXFBConfigCompatibleWithRenderFmt unsupported format
WINED3DFMT_A8
err:d3d:IWineD3DImpl_IsGLXFBConfigCompatibleWithRenderFmt unsupported format
WINED3DFMT_X4R4G4B4
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513
------- Additional Comments From jr-winebugs(a)quo.to 2005-10-10 18:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=1148)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=1148&action=view)
Example code
Here's a simple example program that illustrates the difference between Windows
and Wine.
Try running the code on Windows (95 or later). Press F1. The program displays:
"Got 0x4d message. Pass it to DefWindowProc?" If you answer Yes, you'll get
another message box: "Got WM_HELP message." If you answer No, Windows will not
send a WM_HELP message.
On Wine, you just get the "Got WM_HELP message" box. A 0x4d message is never
received by the application.
So, in summary, Wine's current behavior is as follows:
- F1 keystroke received
- SendMessage(..., WM_HELP, ...)
The behavior should be:
- F1 keystroke received
- PostMessage(..., 0x4d, 0, 0)
- In DefWindowProc:
case 0x4d:
SendMessage(..., WM_HELP, ...)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954
truiken(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |truiken(a)gmail.com
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954
truiken(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From truiken(a)gmail.com 2005-10-10 18:05 -------
I've written a test case that confirms this behavior. I'll send it to wine-patches.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.