http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3432
dank(a)kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL|http://www.xforce- |http://www.xforce-online.de
|online.de/index.php |
Keywords| |download
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2005-01-10 00:13 -------
The game can be downloaded from
http://www.xforce-online.de/download/xforce-setup.exe
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461
infyquest(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From infyquest(a)gmail.com 2005-30-09 23:48 -------
closing this as it an implementation discussion.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2201
infyquest(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |ABANDONED
------- Additional Comments From infyquest(a)gmail.com 2005-30-09 23:44 -------
closing as abandoned , please re-open it if you have got any more issues
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2005-30-09 22:31 -------
HAL.DLL & NTOSKRNL.EXE are the two major pieces of the windows NT+ kernel. Even
if you stub HAL.DLL (it's easy all it probably imports are a SpinLock functions)
there are still no way this can work on Wine. Because it's missing completely
kernel level environment.
You best bet is to use no-cd patches for your application.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2398
------- Additional Comments From phil(a)ldex.terica.net 2005-30-09 21:50 -------
The problem is that :
a) The previous version worked for this app and potentially many others before
the change. The current version doesn't and there is no workaround/fix except
downgrading Wine. That kind of breakage would put off a good number of people
from using wine for any kind of development purpose. It would have been better
to retain the choice until bugs in the new code were hammered out (such as this
one). If I were a commercial vendor looking at something like Winelib for
porting an application, I suspect I would be less than encouraged by this
all-or-nothing approach to evolving the system. I don't dispute that many other
apps have seen their behaviour improve with the change - I'm simply suggesting
that having two systems side-by-side would be a better option at the moment.
Once this and other issues have been resolved in the new code, the old code
could be removed.
b) The old working version of Wine is not packaged for current distributions.
The user is left with a choice of attempting to install a package for an older
distribution (potentially also conflicting with any newer version of wine that
they care to install) or with compiling from source. That's not particularly
friendly and those users coming from Windows who are determined enough to go
this far will be few and far between (noting that Windows folks are not
generally disposed to filing bug reports following years of being ignored by
many vendors).
If there is no technical way of having both systems implemented in Wine (with
the old system being chosen by a command line switch or environment variable),
then what about having the last-known-good version of Wine available for current
distributions (and being able to be side-installed with the current version of
Wine)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3416
dank(a)kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2005-30-09 21:02 -------
OK, good luck with the Fedora bug!
Thanks for clarifying your remark about documentation.
Yes, Wine needs better doc before the 0.9 release!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.