http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
------- Additional Comments From fenix(a)club-internet.fr 2005-09-03 16:12 -------
I just sent a patch to fix a leak into x11drv
can you try again after commit ?
Regards,
Raphael
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
------- Additional Comments From spa(a)starfinanz.de 2005-09-03 15:59 -------
There was one such call that returns successfully. I didn't see any difference
between this and the other calls in the logfile.
Your patch works if we do it in the W-function also. So that it is already an
improvement.
But it would be better if we can find out the reason for calls with only one
filled parameter and the last flag=100. Do you think it could be only a call to
increment the hit counter in the INTERNET_CACHE_ENTRY_INFO structure?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2617
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #732 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #737 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2005-09-03 15:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=785)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=785&action=view)
last 10,000 lines Log using +ole, +tid with bactrace (CVS 2005/03/09)
We get a lot further with current cvs (2005/03/09). Now I get a crash in
Ikernel.exe. The log is attached. If I pass or quit I get a popup box saying
there was an error (an error occured while lauching the setup (0x800706c0))
with an OK button. When I click on the OK button the setup program quits.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939
tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2005-09-03 12:12 -------
We now have the ability to assign a bug the resolution "ABANDONED"
http://cvs.winehq.org/cvsweb/bugzilla/checksetup.pl.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2695
------- Additional Comments From ulrich.czekalla(a)utoronto.ca 2005-09-03 09:17 -------
What application is demonstrating this problem? Do you have a sample app I can
use to debug it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
------- Additional Comments From bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de 2005-09-03 03:17 -------
At least for the log you show, every return value of
GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW(...,0,0,...,0x100) is NULL, meaning failure. Is there
any call that succeeds (retval != 00000000)? Otherwise simply rejecting the call
when the third arument is a null pointer might help
Perhaps try something like
diff -u -w -r1.24 urlcache.c
--- wine/dlls/wininet/urlcache.c 8 Feb 2005 13:43:09 -0000 1.24
+++ wine/dlls/wininet/urlcache.c 9 Mar 2005 09:16:14 -0000
@@ -1135,6 +1135,8 @@
TRACE("(%s, %p, %p)\n", debugstr_a(lpszUrlName), lpCacheEntryInfo,
lpdwCacheEntryInfoBufferSize);
+ if (lpdwCacheEntryInfoBufferSize == 0)
+ return FALSE;
if (!URLCacheContainers_FindContainerA(lpszUrlName, &pContainer))
return FALSE;
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2534
torbjorn.e.andersson(a)tietoenator.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From torbjorn.e.andersson(a)tietoenator.com 2005-09-03 01:36 -------
Well, it works fine for me now. I just wasn't aware that I could close the bug
report. (I still don't know if I can, but I guess I'm about to find out. :-)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
------- Additional Comments From spa(a)starfinanz.de 2005-08-03 18:57 -------
Yes, snooping shows same arguments and native wininet seems not to have
problems with it:
000b:RET SHLWAPI.StrChrW() retval=00000000 ret=71015008
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.41(406ca53c L"Visited: sven@mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%"...,406ca664)
ret=71015026
000b:RET SHLWAPI.41() retval=406ca662 ret=71015026
000b:CALL WININET.GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW(406ca53c L"Visited:
sven@mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%"...,00000000,0000
0000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000100) ret=71015253
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.308(406ca53c L"Visited: sven@mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%"...,ffffffff)
ret=7020487e
000b:RET SHLWAPI.308() retval=00000000 ret=7020487e
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.153(403a1410 "Cookie:",406c8f24 "Visited:
sven@mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%"...,00000007) ret=7
0204069
000b:RET SHLWAPI.153() retval=ffffffed ret=70204069
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.153(403a1528 "Visited:",406c8f24 "Visited:
sven@mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%"...,00000008) ret=
70204069
000b:RET SHLWAPI.153() retval=00000000 ret=70204069
000b:RET WININET.GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW() retval=00000000 ret=71015253
000b:CALL MSVCRT.memmove() ret=70d5f5d4
Of course there are other section where params are set as expected:
000b:RET WININET.CommitUrlCacheEntryA() retval=00000001 ret=7101148b
000b:CALL WININET.GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW(406ce270 L"mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%2050%20hilfe.c"...,406cc270,406c
f2c8,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000) ret=71012ad0
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.308(406ce270 L"mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%2050%20hilfe.c"...,ffffffff)
ret=7020487e
000b:RET SHLWAPI.308() retval=00000000 ret=7020487e
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.153(403a1410 "Cookie:",406cc0d4 "mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%2050%20hilfe.c"...,00000007)
ret=7
0204069
000b:RET SHLWAPI.153() retval=fffffff6 ret=70204069
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.153(403a1528 "Visited:",406cc0d4 "mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%2050%20hilfe.c"...,00000008)
ret=
70204069
000b:RET SHLWAPI.153() retval=00000009 ret=70204069
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.153(403a19b8 ":2005030920050310: ",406cc0d4
"mk:@MSITStore:C:
\\Programme\\StarMoney%205.0%20S-Edition\\help\\49\\sm%2050%20hilfe.c"...,000
00013) ret=70204069
000b:RET SHLWAPI.153() retval=ffffffcd ret=70204069
000b:RET WININET.GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW() retval=00000000 ret=71012ad0
000b:CALL SHLWAPI.158(70c99140,70d6fd88 L"readystatechange") ret=70c992e8
In the log file I can see that every call with third param=nil has last
param=100. Must be a secret flag.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2629
fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2005-08-03 17:58 -------
I sent a patch fixing the link to wine-patches.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.