http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3102
felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |fenix(a)club-internet.fr
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 16:26 -------
Reassigning to the author of the blamed patch. Raphael, could you take a look at
this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2230
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 16:19 -------
Could you provide a testapp demonstrating the described behaviour?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 16:17 -------
> hBummer is assigned a pointer return from LoadCursorA. Because it
> transitively loads an icon with the LR_SHARED flag, it returns an object
> that has a reference count.
AFAIK it doesn't. It stays in memory until the module is unloaded (If i'm not
mistaken there is no way to free an LR_SHARED resource anyway? DestroyCursor
isn't allowed according to MSDN). And since subsequent calls will return a
handle to the already loaded resource this is not really a leak... resolving
invalid.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 15:37 -------
(FYI, the effects of specifying no printer driver and a wrong printer driver are
exactly the same for this app - without those win.ini entries it tries to load
".DRV" - which fails)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 15:35 -------
This obviously can't work anyway as you don't have a "CANON800.DRV" driver in
Wine. I couldn't get this farther than enumerating my printers on the load of
the proper driver as I don't have one and no experience with CUPS (maybe it's
possible to add a fake printer, I don't know).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From pgr(a)arcelectronicsinc.com 2005-30-07 14:22 -------
I tested with win95se with and without printer installed. Three changes to win.ini
*** noprtini/WIN.INI 2005-07-30 13:03:30.000000000 -0400
--- withprnt/WIN.INI 2005-07-30 14:33:34.000000000 -0400
***************
*** 1,8 ****
--- 1,9 ----
[windows]
load=
run=
NullPort=None
+ device=Canon Bubble-Jet BJC-600,CANON800,FILE:
[Desktop]
Wallpaper=(None)
TileWallpaper=0
***************
*** 339,348 ****
--- 340,351 ----
Package=Package,Package,packager.exe,picture
Wordpad.Document.1=WordPad Document,WordPad
Document,C:\PROGRA~1\ACCESS~1\WORDPAD.EXE,picture
[Devices]
+ Canon Bubble-Jet BJC-600=CANON800,FILE:
[PrinterPorts]
+ Canon Bubble-Jet BJC-600=CANON800,FILE:,15,45
[Sounds]
SystemDefault=,
------------
Added the Cannon info from a real 95 system to the wine win.ini. The wine
win.ini had entrys for my priters from Cups but was missing the [PrinterPorts]
section.
The result of testing with cvs from about 20050728 still showed the same error
with changes to win.ini
When I get some free time I will be looking to narrow it down to the exact API
call that is casusing the failure.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
Summary: window don't minimize domino client 6.5.x
Product: Wine
Version: 20050725
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: sebern(a)web.de
Using Wine for Domino client 6.5.4 on Linux system (SL9.3, KDE3.4.1). With the
last versions it's not possible to minimize the Domino client window, tested
with versions 20050725, 20050628, 20050524 and 20050419. Currently I'm using
version 20041201, which don't have that problem. Installed package for SL9.3
is precompiled one from sourceforge.net, not self compiled from source.
Followed error message with e.g. 20050725:
err:win:DefWindowProcA called for other process window 0x10020
err:x11drv:X11DRV_CreateWindow invalid window width 1077668124
err:win:DefWindowProcA called for other process window 0x10020
err:win:DefWindowProcA called for other process window 0x10020 ...
The last message come continuously.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3142
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 11:05 -------
Actually no, it's looking for some win.ini entries which are not there (as we
don't ship a win.ini) - I guess these should be mapped to the registry like on NT.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3125
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-30-07 10:47 -------
Some more information is needed to track down the problem, so please do the
following:
Run the program using WINEDEBUG=+syslevel cause it to hang and paste the last
page before the "Expect deadlock!" here.
While it's hanging fire up winedbg in another terminal and type "bt all". Paste
the (full) output here.
Run the program using WINEDEBUG=+syslevel,+relay cause it to hang and paste the
last few pages before the "Expect deadlock!" here.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.