http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1674
Bug 1674 depends on bug 1954, which changed state.
Bug 1954 Summary: SHFileOperation doesn't create subdirectories (it should)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-24-01 23:13 -------
Strange. It's reading few pieces of itself (at the most end of the log). And
then exits.
Could you try with native msvcrt.dll?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2895
------- Additional Comments From userwaldo(a)theeggbeater.net 2006-24-01 22:37 -------
I'm getting the same error message "Unload the debugger and try again." with
wine 0.9.5. I would try the nocd patch, but I can't find it. Can someone point
me to this patch?
Also I've seen other people weems to be able to get this working in older
versions of wine, wonder a patch is needed now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413
------- Additional Comments From vapier(a)gentoo.org 2006-24-01 21:36 -------
wow i feel retarded for not noticing that myself ... e-mail sent !
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413
------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-24-01 21:34 -------
Doh! spelling error... wine-patches(a)winehq.org of course.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413
------- Additional Comments From vapier(a)gentoo.org 2006-24-01 21:28 -------
seems the wine-patches list is down atm ... guess i'll try again later
Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
wine-patchs(a)winehq.org
SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data:
host localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]: 550 5.1.0 unknown user
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From vapier(a)gentoo.org 2006-24-01 21:12 -------
no, it isnt a Gentoo specific issue
however, you would only see the bug if you built everything with
-fstack-protector (which is the default on Gentoo hardened systems)
go into the loader directory and try to compile everything in there with
'-fstack-protector' ... it should error during the final link because ssp
symbols were not found (which is because wine-preloader does not link against
system libc or system ldso)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)codeweavers.com 2006-24-01 20:22 -------
Two things:
Looks like it would be better to fix the reason it fails with -fstack-protector.
I'm gcc built from the gcc 4.1 branch, and Wine built with that gcc
4.1-branch-ish works with no problem for me. Perhaps this is a problem with Gentoo?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-24-01 20:12 -------
Patches tend to bitrot here. Please submit it to wine-patchs(a)winehq.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413
------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-24-01 20:11 -------
Patches tend to bitrot here. Please submit it to wine-patchs(a)winehq.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4411
tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-24-01 20:04 -------
I was just cleaning up the database in those cases (they had no app name thats
why I deleted them)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4413
Summary: have winegcc pass -m32/-m64 along to the linker
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-tools
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: vapier(a)gentoo.org
when you compile with -m32/-m64, winegcc will strip these flags out ... but they
are needed as raw linker flags as well
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4412
Summary: disable stack protector on the wine loader
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-loader
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: vapier(a)gentoo.org
we've been using this in Gentoo for quite some time but i havent sent it
upstream as ssp support in gcc used to be a Gentoo-only feature ... but with
newer versions of gcc (namely gcc-4.1+), ssp support has been added officially
so this patch will detect if the compiler supports the -fno-stack-protector flag
and if it does, automatically build the loader with it (as building the loader
with -fstack-protector will fail)
the patch is based on code found in glibc's configure script
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4411
Summary: "Submitted version deleted" message should include name
of and link to app
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: website-bugs
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
All messages sent by the app db to maintainers/reviewers
should include the name of and URL of the affected
application. For instance, right now when a version is deleted,
a cryptic message is sent which doesn't say what app
it was! Here's an example of the uninformative message
currently sent:
-- snip --
Subject: [AppDB] Submitted version deleted
From: AppDB <appdb(a)winehq.org>
Submitted version deleted
-------------------------------------------------------
The version you submitted ( 4) has been deleted.Reason given:
-- snip --
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
------- Additional Comments From wine.dev(a)web.de 2006-24-01 16:55 -------
Hi.
What comes in my mind:
Are there any files in the "fonts"-Dir in the simulated C-Drive
(c:\windows\fonts) ?
When there is any file in this Folder, all Linux-Fonts are ignored
You can Install the common Windows-Fonts in wine from
http://corefonts.sf.net
--
By by ... Detlef
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4397
------- Additional Comments From wine.dev(a)web.de 2006-24-01 16:42 -------
Hi.
I do not think, that the crash comes from winspool.
> fixme:winspool:WINSPOOL_EnumPrinters We don't handle PRINTER_ENUM_CONNECTIONS
The Programm want's to enumerate all Local and Network Printers and
wine support only Printers that are local to wine (visible by CUPS / LPR)
> wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00000240 at address
This look like:
1. The Programm ask for a pointer to a structure and wine returns NULL
2. The Programm does not check the Result and Read a value.
The wired thing is, that the stack and almost all registers are 0
Please run:
WINEDEBUG="+relay,+seh" wine 2>logfile.txt sigaowin.exe
and attach the last 1000 before the crash as file to this Bug.
Is there a Demo-Version available?
Please create an Entry in the Application-Database for this Programm.
--
By by ... Detlef
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
------- Additional Comments From calpatersonpublic(a)gmail.com 2006-24-01 15:53 -------
I think I may be experiencing a different bug from the one in this report.
Perhaps I have the same issue as "Comment #28 From Gregor Muench 2006-01-22
07:39" in that I cannot use Alsa. Anyone agree? If so, I'll go ahead and make
a new report.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4410
Summary: DirectX 9.0c
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-directx
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: timo(a)2idioten.de
It would be really great if you could imply the latest version of directx (9.0c)
in wine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4409
tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.evernote.com/en/
Keywords| |download
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4408
tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://www.evernote.com/en/
Keywords| |download
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
------- Additional Comments From alex(a)thehandofagony.com 2006-24-01 13:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=1758)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=1758&action=view)
Console output with +all
I thought the UNCONFIRMED status was there so a moderator or similar could
confirm it, since the default status changed to NEW for me, but I'll be sure
use UNCONFIRMED in later bugs.
WINEDEBUG=+all does give output, but that seems to be the usual stuff that gets
printed no matter what the application does.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.