wine-bugs February 2006

wine-bugs@winehq.org

3 participants
1301 discussions

[Bug 4436] Storage32 regression problem: ECAD app 'Easy-PC' is unable to create new project/design
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4436 ------- Additional Comments From J.A.Gow(a)furrybubble.co.uk 2006-13-02 07:25 ------- Nice ASCII art :) This is close to what I had in mind, but the problem I found was to ensure that well-behaved apps (i.e. ones that correctly call IStream_Release before IStorage_Release) worked as well as badly behaved ones (that called IStorage_Release and expected all streams to be closed and destroyed at this time) without either creating an object leak. As I see it this requires the following behaviour: We maintain the list of stream objects in the storage object. When the storage destructor is called, before killing the storage object we iterate the list of stream objects. If any are left (badly behaved app) we kill them by calling the IStream destructor for each object in the list, before killing the storage object. Now this is OK, except for the case of a well behaved app that correctly calls the stream object destructor before the storage object destructor. In this case, the stream object destructor will have to inform the storage object that the stream object should be removed from the list of stream objects maintained by the storage object. If the stream object is not removed from the list, when the storage object destructor is called it will attempt to kill the already-destroyed stream object when it finds it in the list. Hey presto- segfault!. So we need an interface by which a stream object can communicate its imminent destruction to the storage object in which it lives - the direction of communication would be stream object -> storage object. And it is here where I am not sure how to proceed. I have the list management stuff coded in the storage object but I need advice on how best to introduce an interface for communication between a stream object destructor and the storage object in which it resides. In your suggestion, it seems that we are not killing the outstanding stream objects when the outstanding Storage objects are destroyed. Surely this would guarantee a memory leak for a badly behaved app? Since it would seem no app would explicitly destroy the stream object and then afterwards try and use the streams created within it during its scope, would it not make more sense to kill outstanding streams with closure of the storage object and avoid the memory leak? I agree it breaks the object rules somewhat, but then it looks like Windows does too! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4561] winecfg crashes first time run
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 ------- Additional Comments From chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com 2006-13-02 07:01 ------- *** Bug 4559 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4559] winecfg crashes with arts driver
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4559 chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com 2006-13-02 07:01 ------- This goes away when I use framebuffer driver, is a dupe of my other bug report. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4561 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4561] winecfg crashes first time run
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 ------- Additional Comments From chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com 2006-13-02 06:14 ------- I have tried the binary on the same platform but different PC and it works. There is something odd going which seems hardware specific (the only major differences I can think of are that I'm using ati binary drivers). I'll retry without the ati drivers. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4561] winecfg crashes first time run
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|other |Linux Platform|Other |PC Version|0.9.7. |CVS -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4561] winecfg crashes first time run
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 ------- Additional Comments From chris.bainbridge(a)gmail.com 2006-13-02 04:46 ------- Created an attachment (id=1879) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=1879&action=view) winecfg-pagefault.txt I recompiled the current wine cvs. The page fault is still present. Log from wine-cvs attached. I am using Linux 2.6.15, Gentoo distro. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4570] New: dbghelp.dll.so: symbol regexec not defined in libc.so.6
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4570 Summary: dbghelp.dll.so: symbol regexec not defined in libc.so.6 Product: Wine Version: 0.9.7. Platform: PC URL: http://www.ag.ch/steueramt/de/pub/angebote/steuererklaer ungen.php OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-misc AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: moz(a)liebesgedichte.siteware.ch The programm EasyTax 2005 (get a free version from the provided link) fails with the following output: wine "C:\Program Files\EasyTax\AG2005\EasyTax2005_AG.exe" err:ole:CoGetClassObject class {00000514-0000-0010-8000-00aa006d2ea4} not registered err:ole:create_server class {00000514-0000-0010-8000-00aa006d2ea4} not registered fixme:ole:CoCreateInstance no classfactory created for CLSID {00000514-0000-0010-8000-00aa006d2ea4}, hres is 0x80040154 wine: Unhandled exception 0x0eedfade at address 0x0000:0x7fcb08d0 (thread 0009), starting debugger... err:module:load_builtin_dll failed to load .so lib for builtin L"dbghelp.dll": /usr/lib/wine/dbghelp.dll.so: symbol regexec, version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined infile libc.so.6 with link time reference err:module:import_dll Loading library dbghelp.dll (which is needed by L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winedbg.exe") failed (error c000007a). err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"C:\\windows\\system32\\winedbg.exe" failed, status c0000135 Is this a compatibility problem with the glibc of debian stable or a something else? Using the builds from http://wine.sourceforge.net/apt/. Any help appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4558] Some numeric keypad keys don't work in user mode
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2006-12-02 23:42 ------- what winver are you using? if it is win98, try changing it to winxp or win2k. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4562] fixme:win:SetWindowTextA setting text "...." of other process window
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4562 vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-12-02 23:16 ------- You know better then anyone else that there are stuff that is not so important. This being one of them. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 4561] winecfg crashes first time run
by Wine Bugs 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561 ------- Additional Comments From vitaliy(a)kievinfo.com 2006-12-02 23:15 ------- Please install NOT STRIPPED wine and _attach_ back trace again. Olse update your HW/OS. And specify distro. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs February 2006