http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9014
Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jaimerave(a)gmail.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8776
Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |focht(a)gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from Anastasius Focht <focht(a)gmx.net> 2007-12-03 19:42:13 ---
Hello,
@Louis Lenders
Although I'm not subscribed to any wine mailing lists I sometimes read the
parts using news.gmane.org archive.
Just a simple advice: adding test cases for the patch will rise chances
The patch is just an improved version of yours with synchronous handling of
multiple segments and initial parameter validation added.
Make standard harness tests: NULL pointers, misaligned data chunks and reading
multiple chunks.
The remaining "invalid input data" cases (invalid buffers/segment structures
passed into API) can be discarded for now.
If some broken app appears one day, this "special" treatment can be added then
( using SEH or 'evil' IsBadXXX).
For the file offset case (which gets passed via overlapped into ReadFile and
manually incremented within loop) it's probably cleaner to save the value to a
temporary and later restore it before scatter API function returns.
It might be possible that some brain damaged app tries to "reuse" the offset in
"+=" fashion.
If the above criteria are met, I don't see any objections that you can't post
it to wine patches.
Regards
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8774
--- Comment #27 from Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> 2007-12-03 18:47:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9477)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9477)
Test patch
Can you try this patch? I wrote a test covering some occlusion query special
cases. I do not see any of them specifically fixing this bug, but who knows,
maybe it helps.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8189
Evan Teran <eteran(a)alum.rit.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eteran(a)alum.rit.edu
--- Comment #10 from Evan Teran <eteran(a)alum.rit.edu> 2007-12-03 18:07:18 ---
City of Heroes works great with 0.9.50!
Thanks for the great work.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9651
Summary: MsiError 259 when installing LabVIEW
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.44.
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: wine-msi
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: john_re(a)fastmail.us
NationalInstruments LabView install from cd,
Installer loads, proceeds to about 5% progress, then gets this error:
"Fatal Error. Unhandled MSI Error"
"MsiError 259: <Unable to format error record.>"
Severity - the sw won't install - install fails.
wine 0.9.44 from wine depository. KUbuntu Fiesty 07.04
upon suggestion from wine IRC I did in ~ "mv .wine .wine.old" then redid the
install attempt - still same exact error.
MSI = MS Installer?
Labview xtra 8.2
"NI LabVIEW 8.2"
"Fatal Error. Unhandled MSI Error"
"MsiError 259: <Unable to format error record.>"
"Unhandled MSI Error"
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Unhandled+MSI+Error%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&…
"Msi Error 259"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:of…
Help please. Thanks. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8895
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |john_re(a)fastmail.us
--- Comment #25 from James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> 2007-12-03 14:13:48 ---
*** Bug 9651 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7418
Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank(a)kegel.com
--- Comment #29 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2007-12-03 13:17:24 ---
Exactly what native DLLs are you using?
We've been improving builtin dcom lately.
It would be interesting to hear whether wine-0.9.50
can run it ok with just fakeie6 and mdac26, and no dcom98:
wget http://kegel.com/wine/winetricks
sh winetricks fakeie6 mdac26
wine ".wine/drive_c/Program Files/Juris Data/MTJuris.exe"
if you can give that a try.
(I do still have the app here, but limited time to test...)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7965
Vijay Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #40 from Vijay Kamuju <infyquest(a)gmail.com> 2007-12-03 12:23:24 ---
resolving as fixed as the patch is the git.
If there are any more crashes raise a new bug
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.