http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8439
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|-unknown |msi
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7189
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|kernel32 |msi
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
--- Comment #31 from brendan <bed88012(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 21:03:54 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> That's the way Alexandre wants it
what are we trying to do, create windows or an _compatibility_ layer
> > Your current patch for this bug doesn't handle moving file over different mount
> > points.
> >
> Quite so, but neither does MoveFile.
>
yeah MoveFile doesn't do it by default, but it can with the flag
MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1110
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #10628|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
--- Comment #29 from Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> 2008-02-05 18:12:10 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Sorry, I didn't know that you couldn't use code reuse (since the committed
> version of MoveFileWithProgressW relies on other Windows API calls), is there a
> reason this?
>
That's the way Alexandre wants it (also MoveFile uses Nt* calls, which are
lower level). For some historical background I think you'll find the
similarities between my original Feburary 2007 patch and your suggested patch
interesting (yes, this patch has been on the table for almost a year):
http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-February/036394.html
> Your current patch for this bug doesn't handle moving file over different mount
> points.
>
Quite so, but neither does MoveFile.
> Also those gotos aren't helping your cause.
>
Wine is not a college exercise in flow statements. If you take a look around
the code base "goto" is the standard practice for handling error conditions.
This practice puts all cleanup code in one centralized location so that changes
down the road do not neglect to clean something up.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768
Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank(a)kegel.com
--- Comment #13 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-05 17:51:03 ---
Agreed, if it can be tested by anybody, perhaps
we should leave it open even if the original poster abandoned it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
Ben McCann <benjamin.j.mccann(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |benjamin.j.mccann(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #41 from Ben McCann <benjamin.j.mccann(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 17:39:34 ---
Yuval said in bug 4538 (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4538#c7) that he
was working on a fix, but I have heard nothing. I'd also love for this to get
fixed since it affects quite a few apps.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
brendan <bed88012(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bed88012(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #28 from brendan <bed88012(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 17:20:00 ---
(In reply to comment #27)
>
> If Alexandre would have permitted using Windows API calls then this would have
> been patched a long time ago. That is why the latest patch is different from
> the older ones, see
> http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-October/059948.html for details.
>
Sorry, I didn't know that you couldn't use code reuse (since the committed
version of MoveFileWithProgressW relies on other Windows API calls), is there a
reason this?
Your current patch for this bug doesn't handle moving file over different mount
points. Also those gotos aren't helping your cause.
> Brendan, I don't think you can use printf inside kernel32.dll.
> Use TRACE instead if you really want to log something.
>
> I think you can leave off the bit about the three unimplemented flags.
>
> Also, it's "therefore", not "there for".
yeah, I relied that after I attached it to this bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6224
--- Comment #22 from Neil Skrypuch <ns03ja(a)brocku.ca> 2008-02-05 15:51:32 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
>
> Can you try in a virtual desktop?
>
The results are identical in a virtual desktop.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank(a)kegel.com
--- Comment #40 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-05 12:21:38 ---
The log still shows
fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextA stub
and there are no plans yet to implement that
part of secur32 that I know of.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6579
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #14 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 12:03:38 ---
Closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6579
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 12:03:25 ---
Demo works fine, and no response from reporter. Resolving fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7645
--- Comment #1 from Juan Lang <juan_lang(a)yahoo.com> 2008-02-05 11:34:40 ---
Does this still happen on more recent versions of Wine?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6046
--- Comment #6 from Mark Matienzo <mark.matienzo(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 11:25:15 ---
I've tried going back as far as 0.9.16, and it seems the bug still exists for
the application I'm working with since before then.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6224
--- Comment #21 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 11:17:36 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> With wine-0.9.54-85-gfb6ea67 from a clean ~/.wine, it installs flawlessly, and
> starts up without crashing or complaining, but it displays nothing other than a
> black screen (and a custom mouse cursor) for the intro videos and what I assume
> is the main menu. Sound continues playing though, and it responds to an alt+f4.
>
Can you try in a virtual desktop?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7931
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 11:00:00 ---
Closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7931
James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |ABANDONED
--- Comment #3 from James Hawkins <truiken(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 10:59:29 ---
Abandoned.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
--- Comment #39 from Jaime Rave <jaimerave(a)gmail.com> 2008-02-05 10:53:11 ---
Any news about this bug???
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
--- Comment #27 from Erich Hoover <ehoover(a)mines.edu> 2008-02-05 09:56:25 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
>Does someone know if this patch was applied ? and if not, why ? It would be a shame that a patch which obviously solves a problem stays buried in he abyss af the bugzilla.
No, I have submitted several different versions of this patch and only rarely
received responses with respect to things that should be changed. The last
email I sent to wine-devel apparently got lost, I'll have to resend it. I was
wondering why I never got a response this time around.
(In reply to comment #25)
> Created an attachment (id=10613)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10613) [details]
> new preposed patch
>
If Alexandre would have permitted using Windows API calls then this would have
been patched a long time ago. That is why the latest patch is different from
the older ones, see
http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-October/059948.html for details.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1163
--- Comment #18 from Shachar Shemesh <shachar(a)shemesh.biz> 2008-02-05 09:49:52 ---
Sorry for the late reply. Been having a hard time connecting to the bugzilla
system.
(In reply to comment #14)
> Shachar,
> I don't want to sound rude, I've spent a lot of time working on BiDi issues for
> CodeWeavers so I really want to get this issue resolved.
Offering to do stuff is not rude (in my book). Tell me to do stuff can
sometimes be.
>
> Just to confirm all I need to do is call DrawText with an RTL string with an &
> in it in underline mode and it will draw the underscore under the wrong letter.
Yes.
> I am happy to try to write a test case, I just did not know when I first
> commented on this bug if Maarten's BiDi work had resolved this.
Maarten's work have not made any progress, functionality wise (at least as far
as I saw). All it did was replace an extremely problematic library (ICU) with a
simpler internal implementation. Functionality wise, it actually introduced
regression in that mirroring used to work and now doesn't (this is, actually, a
rather big deal).
>
> Thanks
> Steven
>
Shachar
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5620
Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dank(a)kegel.com
--- Comment #18 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-02-05 09:40:31 ---
Indeed, you first have to get opengl working before
you can use apps like Wine that depend on it.
Try running some other opengl apps to see if that also tickles the problem.
For instance, does glxgears work?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7931
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Piche <josephpiche(a)vehris.com> 2008-02-05 09:32:19 ---
Actually, I do not own this game any more, so I will not be able to try it.
Sorry.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.