wine-bugs June 2008

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
5528 discussions

[Bug 12471] New: Daily wine GIT snapshot request
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12471 Summary: Daily wine GIT snapshot request Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: t.artem(a)mailcity.com Most Linux users do not have GIT installed and it's a major difficulty for most of them to install and use GIT to fetch the latest snapshot of Wine. At the same time there are many bugs which might have been fixed in a current GIT snapshot. What I propose is a daily current GIT snapshot of Wine as a full .tar.bz2 archive and/or a binary xdelta/deltup patch against the latest released version of Wine (diff is not sufficient as it cannot cope with binary data). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 11618] New: Wineinstall blocks midway through
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11618 Summary: Wineinstall blocks midway through Product: Wine Version: 0.9.55. Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: build-env AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: juhos(a)mbnet.fi When installing wine with tools/wineinstall, it first runs configure, then asks if you want to install system-wide, then runs make. This is wrong, because it forces the user to stick around until configure is finished. Instead, the question should be asked as a first thing when wineinstall runs. This way, local (non-systemwide) installs could run to finish without further user input, and even system-wide ones would only block just before actual install. Of course it would be even better to also ask root password (if needed) at the beginning, but that might have security risks, based on how it is implemented. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 10965] New: DInput wiki entry says status of Joystick support in wine is unknown
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10965 Summary: DInput wiki entry says status of Joystick support in wine is unknown Product: WineHQ.com Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://http://wiki.winehq.org/DInput OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: misc-web AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: remailer(a)gmail.com A few moments ago when looking for the status of joystick support in wine, I googled site:wiki.winehq.org joystick, the third hit was this http://wiki.winehq.org/DInput which is a year old and says: Joystick status No idea :-) It would probably be a good idea if someone updated this with confirmation of support status in wine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 13561] New: wine fails to build with openssl-0.9.8h
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 Summary: wine fails to build with openssl-0.9.8h Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224049 OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wininet AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: vapier(a)gentoo.org starting with openssl-0.9.8h, it has introduced a typedef named "X509_EXTENSIONS" into openssl/x509.h. unfortunately, wine uses a define of the same name in include/wincrypt.h. this triggers an obvious build failure when the typedef is preprocessed into: typedef STACK ((LPCSTR)5); instead of the expected: typedef STACK X509_EXTENSIONS; the full error looks like: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_WINX32_ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wwrite-strings -Wtype-limits -Wpointer-arith -O2 -march=k8 -pipe -g -Wimplicit-function-declaration -o http.o http.c In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:183, from internet.h:48, from http.c:60: /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:207: error: expected ‘)’ before numeric constant In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:183, from internet.h:48, from http.c:60: /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:929: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘LPCSTR’ /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:929: error: expected ‘)’ before numeric constant /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:929: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before ‘(’ token /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:929: error: expected ‘)’ before numeric constant In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:183, from internet.h:48, from http.c:60: /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:929:1: error: pasting ")" and "_it" does not give a valid preprocessing token In file included from internet.h:48, from http.c:60: /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:1023: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘(’ token http.c: In function ‘HTTP_ReadChunked’: http.c:1658: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type http.c:1697: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type make: *** [http.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 12364] New: Overlapping of windows within Photoshop CS2
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12364 Summary: Overlapping of windows within Photoshop CS2 Product: Wine Version: 0.9.58. Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: erappleman(a)gmail.com When you maximize an in Photoshop CS2, it blows up to fill the entire screen instead of just inside the Photoshop application window. All Photoshop interfaces as well as other opened images are overlapped. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 9284] New: Some pages are freely editable
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9284 Summary: Some pages are freely editable Product: WineHQ.com Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: misc-web AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: mverga(a)freemail.it Sections "Development - To Do List" and "Development - Janitorial" are freely editable by anonymous user. I think that is dangerous, is that wished or is it a bug? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 12181] New: SHELL32.dll.SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirA not supported
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12181 Summary: SHELL32.dll.SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirA not supported Product: Wine Version: 0.9.58. Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: collinstocks(a)gmail.com The program Adobe Premiere Pro requires a certain function in order to run that is not implemented in wine yet. Call from 0x102d2818 to unimplemented function SHELL32.dll.SHGetFolderPathAndSubDirA >From the name, it looks like it should be a pretty simple api to implement or at least fake temporarily, although programming in C is not my strong point. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 13661] New: Edit Control Missing CUA Behavior for Ctrl-Home & Ctrl-End
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13661 Summary: Edit Control Missing CUA Behavior for Ctrl-Home & Ctrl- End Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: bsmith(a)sudleyplace.com The CUA behavior for Ctrl-Home and Ctrl-End is to move the cursor to the start/end of the buffer -- this fix implements that behavior in edit.c. Please someone create a patch to edit.c from the following code: * In the declarations section, insert the text -------------------------------------------------- static void EDIT_MoveBufferHome_ML(EDITSTATE *es); static void EDIT_MoveBufferEnd_ML(EDITSTATE *es); -------------------------------------------------- After the definition of (say) EDIT_MoveUp_ML, insert the text -------------------------------------------------- /********************************************************************* * * EDIT_MoveBufferHome_ML * * Only for multi line controls * Move the caret to the beginning of the buffer. * */ static void EDIT_MoveBufferHome_ML(EDITSTATE *es) { EDIT_EM_SetSel(es, 0, 0, FALSE); EDIT_EM_ScrollCaret(es); } /********************************************************************* * * EDIT_MoveBufferEnd_ML * * Only for multi line controls * Move the caret to the end of the buffer. * */ static void EDIT_MoveBufferEnd_ML(EDITSTATE *es) { INT e = get_text_length(es); EDIT_EM_SetSel(es, e, e, TRUE); EDIT_EM_ScrollCaret(es); } -------------------------------------------------- * After the line -------------------------------------------------- case VK_HOME: -------------------------------------------------- insert the text -------------------------------------------------- if ((es->style & ES_MULTILINE) && control) EDIT_MoveBufferHome_ML(es); else -------------------------------------------------- * After the line -------------------------------------------------- case VK_END: -------------------------------------------------- insert the text -------------------------------------------------- if ((es->style & ES_MULTILINE) && control) EDIT_MoveBufferEnd_ML(es); else -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 13761] New: Age of Empires 2 (Age of Kings) runs abnormally slowly
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13761 Summary: Age of Empires 2 (Age of Kings) runs abnormally slowly Product: Wine Version: 1.0-rc4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: chris(a)chrobis.com Created an attachment (id=13796) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=13796) Console output whilst running Age of Empires 2 Age of Empires 2: Age of Kings runs considerably slower than it should on a machine which, running Windows, runs it perfectly. Despite the game being released 1999, a computer purchased new in 2005 is incapable of running it without serious slowdown and constant pauses in movement of items around the map. I've attached the console output but there doesn't appear to be anything that seems to be indicative of the slowdown; I will try to find out if the same behaviour occurs in a demo of the game -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 13354] New: Thanks for work in wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13354 Summary: Thanks for work in wine Product: Wine Version: 1.0-rc1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: obelich(a)gmail.com hiyas this is not a bug this message is for say thanks for all programers are working in wine proyect we like to say thanks in name of all people use this program for play games or work with office software and others software are working in windows plataform we dont have money buth like to say thanks for all people make this is posible sorry my english is to bad i speak spanish :), thanks for you help, thanks for you time, this message is onli for say thanks, thanks y gracias. gracias :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs June 2008