On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:52 PM, <wine-bugs(a)winehq.org> wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18520
>
>
>what you mean did I clean out WINEPREFIX and how?
ray
>
>
> --- Comment #15 from Kai Blin <kai.blin(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-24 23:52:21 ---
> I've tried with ies4linux-latest and Wine 1.1.22 and it installs and runs just
> fine for me. I've also tried with winetricks. Did you clean out the WINEPREFIX?
>
> --
> Configure bugmail:…
[View More]http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
> above URL to reply.
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8241
--- Comment #34 from Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> 2009-05-25 02:16:02 ---
Update test looks OK to me. Before sending it needs either a fix committed
first, or adding todo_wine in appropriate places of the test.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2082
James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net
--- Comment #59 from Zdeněk Kopřivík <zdenek.koprivik(a)post.cz> 2009-05-15 03:57:01 ---
Why is this bug not marked as a regression because it used to work with older
…
[View More]versions of Wine?
--- Comment #60 from Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-15 04:36:07 ---
Zdeněk, it's probably because no one could report the exact version of Wine.
--- Comment #61 from Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-15 04:51:05 ---
I meant the version which works OK in this regard.
--- Comment #62 from James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> 2009-05-24 22:26:42 ---
Reference fix for problem. It was a patched version of Wine 1.1.10. The patch
may or may not still work with later releases of Wine.
--- Comment #63 from James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> 2009-05-24 22:30:57 ---
This code appears in several bugs. I don't have the ability to combine them
all into one bug report:
fixme:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_CreateSwapChain The app requests more than one
back buffer, this can't be supported properly. Please configure the application
to use double buffering(=1 back buffer) if possible
I just updated a different bug with this phrase in it for dOOm.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17792
Summary: Graphical glitches on Ricochet Xtreme... due to triple
buffering?
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.17
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
Component: directx-d3d
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: manwesulimo2004(a)yahoo.co.uk
Ricochet Xtreme works great on Wine 1.…
[View More]1.17.
However there is a bit of a glitch which occurs: When sprites move too quickly
they leave seem to leave a trail. This may have to do with triple buffering.
Here is some output from my console:
fixme:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_CreateSwapChain The app requests more than one bac
k buffer, this can't be supported properly. Please configure the application to
use double buffering(=1 back buffer) if possible
A trial version of the game is downloadable from the following link:
http://www.reflexive.com/RicochetXtreme.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2082
James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net
--- Comment #59 from Zdeněk Kopřivík <zdenek.koprivik(a)post.cz> 2009-05-15 03:57:01 ---
Why is this bug not marked as a regression because it used to work with older
…
[View More]versions of Wine?
--- Comment #60 from Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-15 04:36:07 ---
Zdeněk, it's probably because no one could report the exact version of Wine.
--- Comment #61 from Saulius K. <saulius2(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-15 04:51:05 ---
I meant the version which works OK in this regard.
--- Comment #62 from James McKenzie <jjmckenzie51(a)earthlink.net> 2009-05-24 22:26:42 ---
Reference fix for problem. It was a patched version of Wine 1.1.10. The patch
may or may not still work with later releases of Wine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9127
--- Comment #15 from xnitropl(a)gmail.com 2009-05-24 17:29:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=21296)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21296)
WINEDEBUG=+quartz,-all from Bloodrayne intro
Also show up this error boxes:
PlayCutscene Error
FAILED(hr=0x80004002) in
PlayCutscene Error
Failed(80004002) to set fullscreen!
PlayCutscene Error
Could not find output pin! hr=0x80004001
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/…
[View More]userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8241
--- Comment #33 from Louis Lenders <xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk> 2009-05-24 16:09:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=21293)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21293)
updated test
Updated test acoording to dmitry's comments, thanks for that. Peter ,(if test
is ok) , you could take the test, update your patch (only remove the four
flags mentioned before) and send it for review to wnie-patches.
--
Configure bugmail: http://…
[View More]bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9158
Sjors Gielen <dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com
--- Comment #19 from Sjors Gielen <dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com> 2009-05-24 13:39:23 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I've been thinking about how to handle FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN in Wine. In
…
[View More]> Nautilus (and probably other file managers) you can hide files by creating a
> file called ".hidden" and listing the names of the files you wish to hide.
>
> Once possible proper fix for this bug (aside from the workaround posted) is to
> alter create_file (server/file.c) to add an entry to a .hidden file in the
> destination directory when a file is created with FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN set.
> Then FindFirstFile/FindNextFile could check this file (if it exists) and ignore
> any files listed.
>
> This should give the behaviour needed without having to rename the files so
> they are prefixed with a dot.
As far as I can see, '$shtdwn$.reg' is not prefixed with a dot or anything, so
that can't be the problem here... Right?
--- Comment #20 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-24 14:16:32 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> As far as I can see, '$shtdwn$.reg' is not prefixed with a dot or anything, so
> that can't be the problem here... Right?
The problem is the installer expects the file to be hidden, in the Windows way,
e.g., not a '.', but given the hidden attribute, which Wine does not support.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |18575
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You …
[View More]are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9158
Sjors Gielen <dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com
--- Comment #19 from Sjors Gielen <dazjorz(a)dazjorz.com> 2009-05-24 13:39:23 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I've been thinking about how to handle FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN in Wine. In
…
[View More]> Nautilus (and probably other file managers) you can hide files by creating a
> file called ".hidden" and listing the names of the files you wish to hide.
>
> Once possible proper fix for this bug (aside from the workaround posted) is to
> alter create_file (server/file.c) to add an entry to a .hidden file in the
> destination directory when a file is created with FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN set.
> Then FindFirstFile/FindNextFile could check this file (if it exists) and ignore
> any files listed.
>
> This should give the behaviour needed without having to rename the files so
> they are prefixed with a dot.
As far as I can see, '$shtdwn$.reg' is not prefixed with a dot or anything, so
that can't be the problem here... Right?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[View Less]