wine-bugs January 2013

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
9264 discussions

[Bug 22872] New: PuTTY Pageant authentication agent does not provide cached keys
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 09 Sep '17

09 Sep '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22872 Summary: PuTTY Pageant authentication agent does not provide cached keys Product: Wine Version: 1.1.44 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ninevoltz(a)metalink.net The pageant program for PuTTY does not provide stored keys to other applications, such as plink. To duplicate: wine pageant yourkey.ppk wine plink -s -v -l yourname yourserver Looking up host "10.0.0.212" Connecting to 10.0.0.212 port 22 Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.7 We claim version: SSH-2.0-PuTTY_Release_0.60 Using SSH protocol version 2 Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange with hash SHA-256 Host key fingerprint is: ssh-rsa 2048 xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx Initialised AES-256 SDCTR client->server encryption Initialised HMAC-SHA1 client->server MAC algorithm Initialised AES-256 SDCTR server->client encryption Initialised HMAC-SHA1 server->client MAC algorithm Pageant is running. Requesting keys. If it was working, here it would say: Pageant has 1 SSH-2 keys Trying Pageant key #0 but instead we get a password prompt, as if pageant has no cached keys: Using username "john.voltz". john.voltz(a)10.0.0.212's password: -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 31950] New: AutoCAD 2009: Ribbon not visible
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 08 Sep '17

08 Sep '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31950 Bug #: 31950 Summary: AutoCAD 2009: Ribbon not visible Product: Wine Version: 1.5.15 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: lukasz.wojnilowicz(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 42097 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=42097 Where is the ribbon? Steps to reproduce: 1) remove ~/.wine 2) workaround bug #12532 3) winetricks dotnet30 windowscodecs 4) install AutoCAD2009 5) start AutoCAD2009 Behaviour: Ribbon not visible. Expected behaviour: Ribbon should be visible. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 18287] New: User friendly way to delete comments
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 07 Sep '17

07 Sep '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18287 Summary: User friendly way to delete comments Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Although this has been improved, deleting comments is still a long, painful, laborious task. Adobe Photoshop CS4, just as one example, has a load of comments. The majority of these are pointless and should be removed. The problem being it would take at least an hour to do so. The current method is: 1. Select a thread to delete. 2. Enter (or paste) a reason. 3. Press delete. 4. Wait for the page (and all the comments) to load again. 5. Go to Step 1. If any comments are worth keeping, you have to be careful not to delete them. In apps like photoshop, this can create a LOT of emails too (I've just remove a load of comments from CS3 and received over a hundred emails). A nice method might be: 1. Select "Edit Comments". 2. Tick the stale comments to remove. 3. Enter a generic reason. 4. Hit delete. 5. Job's a good un. Maybe this could then be reduced to one email per person too? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 25543] New: Submitter's test results missing from 'Test Results' table
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 07 Sep '17

07 Sep '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25543 Summary: Submitter's test results missing from 'Test Results' table Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: hoehle(a)users.sourceforge.net The link in the mail that the maintainer receives, e.g. "Test Results submitted for version 1.0 of X by Y" http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=4219&iTestingI… leads to a page that shows the submitter's text with the title "Selected Test Results (selected in 'Test Results' table below)" However, the OS/version/rating 'test results' line corresponding to the submission is missing. Instead the topmost line displays an old (known) entry. This is really confusing and irritating. Furthermore, the page displayed does not show a "process" or "reply" buttons. I need to go to my queue and identify this entry among all the elements of the queue in order to process it. I believe both things worked well in the past -- 2-3 years ago? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 23691] New: Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 04 Sep '17

04 Sep '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23691 Summary: Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system Product: Wine Version: 1.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: wine(a)placesthroughtime.com When attempting to an installation of windows vista on the same machine using the newest feature added to autoruns, having selected appropriate system root and user profile directories, when I click OK to analyze the system it pops up saying "Autoruns requires Administrator privilege to analyze an offline system" -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 23530] New: Bug link queue: "has maintainer" information sometimes incorrect
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 29 Aug '17

29 Aug '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23530 Summary: Bug link queue: "has maintainer" information sometimes incorrect Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio(a)earthlink.net The "Has Maintainer" column in the admin bug link queue sometimes says "No" for apps that do have maintainers. An example is Eve Online, which has 5 maintainers listed in the app entry, but currently shows up in the bug link queue as not having any. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 15524] New: Add language field for applications
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 29 Aug '17

29 Aug '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15524 Summary: Add language field for applications Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: jan-winehq(a)hoogenraad.net Please add a selection box to enter the language of the application. If implemented as a version of an application, allow for different titles of the applications in the different languages. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 16031] New: Missing categorising by video driver version in AppDB
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 29 Aug '17

29 Aug '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16031 Summary: Missing categorising by video driver version in AppDB Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: mityukov(a)gmail.com I found the AppDB is a bit unusable, when it comes to quick check on "Which games will run in my system", or "Will this game run for me". The most important thing, when it come to games - is the Video Driver. For example, there are many games, that run for NVidia owners, but don't run for ATI, and so on. Another point, when it comes to specific driver name and version. For example, open-source "radeon" supports only OpenGL 1.3, and Catalyst supports higher implementations. Moreover, different versions of the same, let say Catalyst, may work differently for this or that program. There are also regressions, etc. Again: Video Drivers in Linux, are not ideal. I would say, this point have even higher affect than the Distribution. What I would like to see, near the "Distribution" column -- is another one: "Video" or something like this, where it will say e.g. "Catalyst 8.9". This way it will be possible to link Rating with certain Video Setup, before taking the decision. Some tools for searching Games, that work with specific video driver(s) would also be _HIGHLY_ appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 25157] New: Black Prophecy crashes on unimplemented function msvcr100.dll._wcsupr_s_l
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 27 Aug '17

27 Aug '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25157 Summary: Black Prophecy crashes on unimplemented function msvcr100.dll._wcsupr_s_l Product: Wine Version: 1.3.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msvcrt AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Reported in http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=21946&iTesting… ('winetricks vcrun2010' ought to work around it, but supposedly doesn't?) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 16169] New: Add field for changes to default winecfg settings to AppDB test report form
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 17 Aug '17

17 Aug '17

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169 Summary: Add field for changes to default winecfg settings to AppDB test report form Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio(a)earthlink.net The AppDB test report form currently does not have a specific field to list changes made to default winecfg settings. Reporters can, of course, use the extra comments section for this, but many forget or don't bother, and even when they do, the information may be buried amongst a number of comments. This causes confusion amongst users (esp. new ones) who expect an app to work well based on a gold rating, but may not realize that it requires some tweaking. Adding a separate field would remind reporters to include this information, and highlight it for readers. This field could also be used to automatically restrict platinum ratings to the stated definition of "no changes required in winecfg." -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs January 2013