wine-bugs September 2022

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
3285 discussions

[Bug 53327] New: Ragnarok Online bad performance
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53327 Bug ID: 53327 Summary: Ragnarok Online bad performance Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: paulo1039(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72711 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72711 log running game client (shining.exe) Hello, i'm playing some Ragnarok online private servers (https://www.shining-moon.com) but the performance is really bad even on wine 7.12 i noticed the CPU usage is really high and the game is very choppy to unplayable levels specially when skills effects, damage numbers and monsters/players appear on screen. this is happening with other private servers too. sadly i can't test official servers since iRO and bRO has Easy-AntiCheat. This was tested with Ryzen 5 5600G on fedora 36 and another computer with nvidia gtx 1650 and arch linux. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 53199] New: dinput:force_feedback - test_windows_gaming_input() sometimes has unexpected reference counts in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53199 Bug ID: 53199 Summary: dinput:force_feedback - test_windows_gaming_input() sometimes has unexpected reference counts in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-dinput Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- dinput:force_feedback - test_windows_gaming_input() sometimes has unexpected reference counts in Wine. There are three known instance but they don't all correspond to the same check: 2022-05-17 force_feedback.c:6097: Test failed: Release returned 1 6096 ref = IAsyncOperation_ForceFeedbackLoadEffectResult_Release( result_async ); 6097 ok( ref == 0, "Release returned %lu\n", ref ); 2022-06-06 and 2022-06-17 force_feedback.c:6057: Test failed: Release returned 1 6056 ref = IForceFeedbackEffect_Release( effect ); 6057 ok( ref == 0, "Release returned %lu\n", ref ); https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#dinput:force_feedback This failure can happen on its own (so it's not a side-effect of another failure) and is pretty rare (~0.8%) so it's bound to cause false positives. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 52875] New: riched20:editor fails in Wine in Hindi
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52875 Bug ID: 52875 Summary: riched20:editor fails in Wine in Hindi Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: richedit Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- riched20:editor fails in Wine in Hindi: editor.c:6064: Test failed: EM_STREAMIN: Test UTF8Split returned 6 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#riched20:editor It also has failures in Wine in other locales and on other Linux configurations but this one is new. A bisect shows that it started after the following commit: commit e81327358a26b160740b3421a4c7f300b4d2f06f Author: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> Date: Wed Apr 13 15:13:16 2022 +0200 kernelbase: Move codepage initialization to ntdll. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org> This commit is also involved in the following failures: * Bug 52873 - oleaut32:typelib fails in Wine in Hindi * Bug 52870 - shlwapi:url - The UrlGetPartA() tests fails in Wine in Hind * Bug 52872 - vbscript:run fails in Wine in Hindi -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 52980] New: conhost.exe:tty - test_tty_input() fails in most locales on Windows
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52980 Bug ID: 52980 Summary: conhost.exe:tty - test_tty_input() fails in most locales on Windows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: programs Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com conhost.exe:tty - test_tty_input() fails in most locales on Windows. Specifically it fails in German, French, Portuguese (Brazil and Portugal), and Spanish (the mixed locale, mx-MX, uses a Spanish keyboard layout). For instance in Portuguese (Brazil): tty.c:1521: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualKeyCode = 12, expected 11 tty.c:1521: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualScanCode = 38 expected 1d tty.c:1521: Test failed: 2f: dwControlKeyState = 109 tty.c:1521: Test failed: 2f: dwControlKeyState = 9 [...] tty.c:1521: Test failed: 3f: dwControlKeyState = 100 tty.c:1544: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualKeyCode = dd, expected db tty.c:1544: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualScanCode = 1b expected 1a tty.c:1544: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualKeyCode = dd, expected db tty.c:1544: Test failed: 2f: wVirtualScanCode = 1b expected 1a https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#conhost.exe:tty The test also fails on cw-gtx560 and cw-rx460, maybe because their keyboard layout is not completely standard due to the KVM. Besides the usual failures on lines 1521 and 1544, those get a few related earlier failures: tty.c:1505: Test failed: 61: wVirtualScanCode = 4f expected 1e tty.c:1505: Test failed: 61: wVirtualScanCode = 4f expected 1e tty.c:1508: Test failed: 64: wVirtualScanCode = 4b expected 20 tty.c:1508: Test failed: 64: wVirtualScanCode = 4b expected 20 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 53233] New: ddraw:ddraw1 - test_clear() has rare failures in Wine on the debian11 VM
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53233 Bug ID: 53233 Summary: ddraw:ddraw1 - test_clear() has rare failures in Wine on the debian11 VM Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- ddraw:ddraw1 - test_clear() has rare failures in Wine on the debian11 VM: ddraw1.c:12626: Test failed: Clear rectangle 3 (pos, neg) has color 0x00000000. ddraw1.c:12628: Test failed: Clear rectangle 1 (pos, pos) has color 0x00000000. ddraw1.c:12630: Test failed: Clear rectangle 4 (NULL) has color 0x00000000. ddraw1.c:12632: Test failed: Clear rectangle 4 (neg, neg) has color 0x00000000. https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#ddraw:ddraw1 The first instance of these failures started some time after 2022-06-06 which is when the debian11 VM was updated and moved to the gpu1 VM host. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 53208] New: user32:msg - The SW_SHOWMINIMIZED test in test_messages() succeeds in Wine with fvwm
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53208 Bug ID: 53208 Summary: user32:msg - The SW_SHOWMINIMIZED test in test_messages() succeeds in Wine with fvwm Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- user32:msg - The SW_SHOWMINIMIZED test in test_messages() succeeds in Wine with fvwm: msg.c:5574: Test succeeded inside todo block: ShowWindow(SW_SHOWMINIMIZED):overlapped: marked "todo_wine" but succeeds https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#user32:msg This todo_wine seems to always succeed in the TestBot's VMs but almost always fails on my box. The difference is probably that the former runs fvwm (with a specially curated configuration) while the latter runs KDE. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 53207] New: user32:msg - test_button_messages() fails randomly in Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53207 Bug ID: 53207 Summary: user32:msg - test_button_messages() fails randomly in Wine Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- user32:msg - test_button_messages() fails randomly in Wine. There are two failure modes: * WM_CTLCOLORBTN (0x135) + WM_DRAWITEM (0x2b) -> 6 failures msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 4: the msg 0x0007 was expected, but got msg 0x0005 instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 5: the msg 0x0135 was expected, but got msg 0x030f instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 6: the msg 0x002b was expected, but got msg 0x001c instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 7: the msg 0x0111 was expected, but got msg 0x0086 instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 8: the msg 0x8000 was expected, but got msg 0x0006 instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 9: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0000 - actual 0009 * WM_CTLCOLORSTATIC (0x138) -> 5 failures msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 4: the msg 0x0007 was expected, but got msg 0x0005 instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 5: the msg 0x0138 was expected, but got msg 0x030f instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 6: the msg 0x0111 was expected, but got msg 0x001c instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 8: the msg 0x8000 was expected, but got msg 0x0086 instead msg.c:6881: Test failed: SetFocus(hwnd) on a button: 9: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0000 - actual 0006 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#user32:msg These failures don't seem to depend on the locale or bitness and were first seen on 2022-06-06. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 52965] New: kernel32:locale - test_GetLocaleInfoW() and test_invariant() fail on Windows in Hindi
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52965 Bug ID: 52965 Summary: kernel32:locale - test_GetLocaleInfoW() and test_invariant() fail on Windows in Hindi Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com kernel32:locale fails on Windows in Hindi when run without the UTF-8 codepage (so with an English system locale): In test_GetLocaleInfoW(): locale.c:394: Test failed: got wrong name L"\0905\092e\0947\0930\093f\0915\093e" locale.c:404: Test failed: got wrong name L"\0905\0902\0917\094d\0930\0947\091c\093c\0940 (\0938\0902\092f\0941\0915\094d\0924 \0930\093e\091c\094d\092f)" locale.c:5096: Test failed: got L"\0905\092e\0947\0930\093f\0915\093e" In test_invariant(): locale.c:5728: Test failed: Expected ret == 39, got 33, error 87 locale.c:5729: Test failed: Expected Invariant Language (Invariant Country), got '?????????? ???? (?????????? ???)' locale.c:5733: Test failed: Expected ret == 18, got 15, error 87 locale.c:5734: Test failed: Expected Invariant Country, got '?????????? ???' locale.c:5738: Test failed: Got '??? ??????????????' https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:locale This can be reproduced with the w10pro64-hi test configuration but these failures do not happen when using UTF-8 (w10pro64-hi-u8). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 52507] New: user32:win has some spurious GetScrollInfo failures
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52507 Bug ID: 52507 Summary: user32:win has some spurious GetScrollInfo failures Product: Wine Version: 7.0-rc1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: rbernon(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- On some VMs and with some window styles, the GetScrollInfo SB_HORZ test sometimes fails with "style 0x100000: expected !100". It was happening consistently on Win10 on the submission test VMs, and tweaking the window size in 34d1c100b044afa5eb6d6243e9fb40db085b78d2 fixed the issue there, but it now fails on more VMs on the testbot pattern page. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 53686] New: The 64-bit kernel32:console is broken on Windows in the GitLab WineTest builds
by WineHQ Bugzilla 09 Dec '22

09 Dec '22

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53686 Bug ID: 53686 Summary: The 64-bit kernel32:console is broken on Windows in the GitLab WineTest builds Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com The 64-bit kernel32:console is broken on Windows in the GitLab WineTest builds: console.c:2352: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 9303856 console.c:2352: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9303952 console.c:2352: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 9304144 console.c:2442: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 9303856 console.c:2442: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9303952 console.c:2442: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 9304144 console.c:2532: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 7 console.c:2532: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9 console.c:2532: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 13 console.c:2948: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 7 console.c:2948: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9 console.c:2948: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 13 console.c:3038: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 7 console.c:3038: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9 console.c:3038: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 13 console.c:3127: Test failed: [9] Expected count to be 0, got 7 console.c:3127: Test failed: [13] Expected count to be 0, got 9 console.c:3127: Test failed: [15] Expected count to be 0, got 13 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#kernel32:console The failures started on 2022-07-26 which is when the WineTest builds switched from the old build system to GitLab. A test with winetest-889fe64d9f2e.exe (built on 2022-07-25) confirms that this test still succeeds when using binaries from the old build system. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs September 2022