wine-bugs December 2023

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
2685 discussions

[Bug 55588] New: mf:mf - test_scheme_resolvers() crashes on Windows 7
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55588 Bug ID: 55588 Summary: mf:mf - test_scheme_resolvers() crashes on Windows 7 Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mfplat Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com mf:mf - test_scheme_resolvers() crashes on Windows 7: mf.c:6488: this is the last test seen before the exception 0958:mf: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000007FEFDD72817 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#mf:mf This started on 2023-08-23 with the commit that introduced the new tests: commit fd3d0113f95d3cd4696497cdce5eb5d6d2aa26f5 Author: Rémi Bernon <rbernon(a)codeweavers.com> Date: Fri Jul 28 08:54:05 2023 +0200 mf/tests: Add some network scheme resolver tests. Note that the TestBot detected the crash but confused it with the random crash from bug 54859 and thus considered it to not be new. That's the issue with crashes: they all look the same. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 55569] New: mshtml:dom - The 32-bit test_attr_collection_attr() crashes on Windows 10 2004+
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55569 Bug ID: 55569 Summary: mshtml:dom - The 32-bit test_attr_collection_attr() crashes on Windows 10 2004+ Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mshtml Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com mshtml:dom - The 32-bit test_attr_collection_attr() crashes on Windows 10 2004+: dom.c:3679: this is the last test seen before the exception 1268:dom: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000001 See https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#mshtml:dom This crash is systematic and started on 2023-08-30. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 54769] New: major regression in dnSpy startup time
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54769 Bug ID: 54769 Summary: major regression in dnSpy startup time Product: Wine Version: 8.5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: galtgendo(a)o2.pl Distribution: --- (OK, this will be quite a bit different than what I've planned when I started to write this) Let's start with an oddity: only 32bit versions of dnSpy work, 64bit fail to show anything besides the recently popular stack corruption line (it does not terminate upon it, but fails to do anything else either). The problem (initially observed in 6.1.8, but dnSpyEx 6.3.0 has the same problem): I'm not quite sure when this happened, but IIRC it was at most two releases back, maybe it was the latest one. Before, upon startup there was a minor delay before the window showed up and every now and then (but relatively rarely) the window got filled with visual garbage until it was refreshed. Now, it *seems* corruption has been dealt with (though that needs more time to be verified), but there's a crippling startup delay (over 2-3 min) between when a blank window shows up and when it's filled with content. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 54361] New: Winebus doesn't enumerate evdev devices in a --without-sdl build unless SDL also disabled by winebus registry key
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54361 Bug ID: 54361 Summary: Winebus doesn't enumerate evdev devices in a --without-sdl build unless SDL also disabled by winebus registry key Product: Wine Version: 8.0-rc5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: j-r(a)online.de Distribution: --- Not sure what info to add. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 53845] New: Regression in GetCalendarInfoEx et al
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53845 Bug ID: 53845 Summary: Regression in GetCalendarInfoEx et al Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: elpochodelagente(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 73375 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=73375 test case, succeeds in Windows and wine 6.0 The following line succeeds in Windows and used to work in Wine 6, but not in Wine 7.19. Attached is a complete program test GetCalendarInfoEx(0, CAL_GREGORIAN_US, 0, CAL_ITWODIGITYEARMAX | CAL_RETURN_NUMBER, 0, 0, dwData); // returns 0 Looking at dlls/kernelbase/locale.c current git master I can see that now there is an explicit check against CAL_GREGORIAN, and if I change the CAL_GREGORIAN_US parameter in the call to CAL_GREGORIAN then GetCalendarInfoEx succeeds. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 21550] New: Winedbg's disassembler doesn't support SSE2 instructions
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21550 Summary: Winedbg's disassembler doesn't support SSE2 instructions Product: Wine Version: 1.1.37 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winedbg AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: b7.10110111(a)gmail.com Winedbg doesn't support SSE2 instructions while gdb does. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 13

[Bug 56028] New: Yakuza 0 not launching on Mac 10.14 with Wine
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56028 Bug ID: 56028 Summary: Yakuza 0 not launching on Mac 10.14 with Wine Product: Wine Version: 8.0.1 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Mac OS X Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dariooliviero09(a)gmail.com Created attachment 75673 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=75673 Here is the error message I don't know much when it comes to Wine, I installed the latest version the site gave me for MAC. In fact, wine's settings should be the default ones, running a Windows 10 system. For a offline single player game such as Fallout New Vegas, Wine worked pretty well. Thanks to that, I decided to try a newer game: Yakuza 0. After having bought it on GOG.com, I tried running the .exe file to no avail. I admit that I didn't spot the issue as I am a bit clueless when it comes to wine, but I should've attached the error message with this. What do I have to do? Thank you in advance -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 55665] New: Wine versions >=8.9 do not load Fallout 4 properly
by WineHQ Bugzilla 15 Dec '23

15 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 Bug ID: 55665 Summary: Wine versions >=8.9 do not load Fallout 4 properly Product: Wine Version: 8.9 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: rcs777(a)proton.me Distribution: --- I'm sorry if this is a bit long, but I want to be as detailed as possible. In short, I usually build Wine myself using TkGlitch's build scripts and put the resulting build in Lutris's runtime path. I find that TkG Wine offers slightly better performance for Games than my system-provided wine. However when Wine 8.9 rolled around, my self compiled builds stopped working with Fallout 4; the game simply crashed before the intro played with no backtrace provided. My FO4 has its own logs thanks to mods and they told me it crashed in XAudio2_7.dll. It's worth noting that for FO4 I have XAudio2_7 set to native in winecfg, otherwise the audio that comes through is very muffled. It's pretty much a must have for a playable experience. The first thing I did was try a plain non-modified build of Wine from my package manager and a clean prefix, but had no luck. After some trial and error I found that FO4 works perfectly on plain Wine 8.8, so I bisected between 8.8 and 8.9 and found that the startup failure was caused by commit 354a8bb1f4a65bdec052606f2799db9e2907b5b1, "ntdll: Better match Windows subheap sizes". However... Reverting that patch only works up to 8.10, on plain 8.11 and up I was back to square one with crashing in XAudio before the intro video. So after bisecting from 8.10 with that patch reverted just for good measure (I don't know if it's actually needed past 8.9) and 8.11, I came up with a82238fad52761114ab2488d422fad3f70dbb854, "ntdll: Allocate 64-bit and kernel stacks in high memory". Assuming that reverting that patch would fix the latest development version too, I jumped straight to 8.16 and reverted it. I found that I also had to revert 3ac808e46e4795e14c5b999aa39fd9cd15f95279, "ntdll: Set Wow64 user space limit based on LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE" and f473e31341a0dbc2eb5222cc1d1cfe468946bf0a, "ntdll: Load modules with a high base address in high memory" too. I'm not sure if those last two patches actually break anything, but they seem to depend on variables introduced in the 64-bit Allocate patch so without reverting these too I got build time failures. In any case, once these patches are reverted on Wine 8.16, I get a clean build and Fallout 4 works perfectly again. Here's where I'm confused... I grabbed a vanilla Wine 8.16 build from https://github.com/Kron4ek/Wine-Builds... and it worked, unpatched, out of the box. As far as I can tell from his build scripts, those Wine builds are compiled on Ubuntu Bionic, which means those libraries and compilers are likely far older than mine on Debian Sid. Maybe it's something that an older compiler is doing different, seeing as how the reverted patches seem to have a lot to do with memory allocation? If that were the case it might not even be a bug in Wine. In any case, here's my specs: OS: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid x86_64 Kernel: 6.5.0-1-amd64 DE: Plasma 5.27.8 CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (16) @ 3.800GHz GPU: AMD ATI Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 XT Memory: 3931MiB / 32011MiB GCC Version: gcc (Debian 13.2.0-4) 13.2.0 All build dependencies while running the configure script were satisfied except for OSS, and I've never actually had satisfied. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 55139] New: loader: regression - error running winecfg
by WineHQ Bugzilla 14 Dec '23

14 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55139 Bug ID: 55139 Summary: loader: regression - error running winecfg Product: Wine Version: 8.11 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: loader Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: arusanu.bu(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- The switch to PIE loader seems to affect running wine on my system. Running winecfg generates these errors: '$ winecfg wine: created the configuration directory '/home/iurt_build/.wine' 0024:err:environ:run_wineboot failed to start wineboot c00000e5 wine: could not load kernel32.dll, status c0000135' The regression started with commit cc2cfb9b792bee681b96c5859084fd6d4d0bbed7. Reverting that commit and commit 78ed343842dcd8ffb95c416420953e121959d40d commit c55578f3a54c63084657e7d79c043b22b10df989 commit ac1761d1dae8bf114a05e28ed6886deba6c2c860 , allows wine 8.11 to run fine. System: Mageia 9(cauldron), kernel-6.3.9 - x86_64., gcc-12.3.0, mingw-gcc-12.2.1 Wine specific configuration options used for x86_64/i586: ' ./configure --with-x --with-dbus --with-gstreamer --enable-win64 --with-system-dllpath=/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin --disable-tests ./configure --with-x --with-dbus --with-gstreamer --with-system-dllpath=/usr/i586-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin --disable-tests ' -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 49312] New: wineg++ - "invalid program stack in 64-bit code" on exception catching - regression
by WineHQ Bugzilla 14 Dec '23

14 Dec '23

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49312 Bug ID: 49312 Summary: wineg++ - "invalid program stack in 64-bit code" on exception catching - regression Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dd-tom(a)web.de Distribution: --- Created attachment 67324 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=67324 full crash log Referencing this issue here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/1881293 When compiling the following C++ program with "wineg++ main.cpp": #include <stdexcept> #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("start\n"); try { throw std::runtime_error("desc"); } catch (std::exception &ex) { printf("in catch\n"); } printf("end\n"); } Wine crashes with: Unhandled exception: assertion failed, invalid program stack in 64-bit code (0x00007f33f6c24781). The full log is attached. Tested with (not working): - Debian Bullseye and wine 5.0 (packaged) - wine 5.0 compiled from source on Debian Buster Regression since wine 4.0, tested working with: - Debian Buster and wine 4.0 (packaged) - wine 4.0 compiled from source on Debian Buster -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs December 2023