wine-bugs April 2023

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
3036 discussions

[Bug 53652] New: invalid URL in wine-bugs digest email footer
by WineHQ Bugzilla 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53652 Bug ID: 53652 Summary: invalid URL in wine-bugs digest email footer Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: 3.2.3 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: regression Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com, jnewman(a)codeweavers.com, julliard(a)winehq.org Distribution: --- I'm guessing this happened around the mailman upgrade: Sep 10: _______________________________________________ wine-bugs mailing list -- wine-bugs(a)winehq.org - To unsubscribe send an email to wine-bugs-leave(a)winehq.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo/%(_internal_name)s versus: July 26: _______________________________________________ wine-bugs mailing list - wine-bugs(a)winehq.org https://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-bugs 'bisecting' the regression, it occurred between: bad: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 46 good: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 45 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 28467] New: Chromium Browser restore button doesn't work
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 25 Jan '25

25 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28467 Summary: Chromium Browser restore button doesn't work Product: Wine Version: 1.3.28 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fracting(a)gmail.com 1. Download chromium from http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Win/95816/chrome-win32.zip unpack chrome-win32.zip, cd to the directory. 2. start chrome.exe with --no-sandbox, works around Bug 21232 $ wine chrome.exe --no-sandbox Notice that the chrome window is decorated by the Linux native window manager. Is it a bug? On windows, chrome have no traditional "window bar". Now there is two "Maximal" button: one is drawn by Linux native window manager, the other is drawed by wine chrome browser it self. 3. Click on the "Maximal" button which is drawn by Linux native window manager, then chrome browser switch to maximal mode as expect. This time, the Linux native window bar is disappear. 4. Click on the "Restore" button of wine chrome browser. However it doesn't work. Wine chrome switch to normal mode for a second, then switch back to maximal mode automatically. I use ubuntu 11.04 , with traditional gnome desktop, gnome 2.32.1 . There is some ways to work around: I. Instead of clicking on the native "Maximal" button in step 3, try to click the wine chrome "Maximal" button, then everything works as expect. II. Do not set "Allow the window manager to decorate the windows" in winecfg, then everything works as expect. III. Do not set "Allow the window manager to control the windows" in winecfg, then everything works as expect. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 36692] New: Bad performance when combineng SetEvent / WaitForSingleObject for synchronizing worker threads
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 24 Jan '25

24 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36692 Bug ID: 36692 Summary: Bad performance when combineng SetEvent / WaitForSingleObject for synchronizing worker threads Product: Wine Version: 1.6.2 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: milasudril(a)gmail.com In a 2d simulation program, each worker thread has its own pair of events. One event is used to signal master thread that the worker thread is ready. The other is used by the master thread to signal that the worker thread may continue. In Master thread: while(!m_stop) { auto proc_ptr=processors.begin(); while(proc_ptr!=processors.end()) { // Call SetEvent on "start" event object owned by the object pointed // to by proc_ptr proc_ptr->frameNext(); ++proc_ptr; } proc_ptr=processors.begin(); while(proc_ptr!=processors.end()) { // Call WaitForSingleObject on "ready" event object owned by // the object pointed to by proc_ptr proc_ptr->wait(); ++proc_ptr; } ++framecounter; } In worker thread: while(!m_stop) { // Wait for master thread signaling start event (Calls WaitForSingleObject) start.wait(); m_model->process(m_framecounter,m_buffers[0].first ,m_buffers[0].second,m_offset); swap(m_buffers[0],m_buffers[1]); // Signal master thread that we are ready for next frame (Calls SetEvent) ready.set(); } On Wine, the framerate is half of that on Windows 7 on the same machine Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz. Also there seems to be a huge different workload on differnt cores when running under Wine. I realize that SetEvent/WaitForSingleObject are heavy functions on Windows too as they need kernel assistance, so it might be hard to make it perform better. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 30

[Bug 43766] New: Safrosoft RoX - Level editor doesn't start
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 24 Jan '25

24 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43766 Bug ID: 43766 Summary: Safrosoft RoX - Level editor doesn't start Product: Wine Version: 2.17 Hardware: x86-64 URL: http://www.autofish.net/shrines/rox/ OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: oleaut32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dark.shadow4(a)web.de Distribution: ArchLinux Created attachment 59268 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=59268 wine log The game's level editor crashes with a messagebox: "Run-time error '481': Invalid picture" Getting an oleaut32.dll from win7, copying it into wine's system32 folder and adding a dll override fixes the issue. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 44900] New: Colour problem with builtin gdiplus
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 24 Jan '25

24 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44900 Bug ID: 44900 Summary: Colour problem with builtin gdiplus Product: Wine Version: 3.5 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gdiplus Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jeremielapuree(a)yahoo.fr Distribution: --- Created attachment 60981 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=60981 Good looking with a native gdiplus With a builtin gdiplus, there is a problem with coloring the cases of channel. Problem does not occur with a native gdiplus dll. Compare the two screenshot: the first one with native dll, the second one with the builtin dll. Note the behaviour in a real Windows 10 box is the behaviour of the native dll. So, there is a problem with the builtin dll. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 19

[Bug 24063] New: World in conflict fails to start in DX10 mode
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24063 Summary: World in conflict fails to start in DX10 mode Product: Wine Version: 1.3.1 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: directx-d3d AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: xvachon(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=30246) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=30246) Log +d3d10 World in Conflict is unable to start in DX10 mode. Native dxdiagn.dll was used to avoid http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11114 and sh winetricks d3dx10 was run too. I uploaded a +d3d10 log. If you need other debug channels, please ask. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 11

[Bug 51285] New: The bmpcoreimage test in user32:cursoricon fails on most Windows versions
by WineHQ Bugzilla 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51285 Bug ID: 51285 Summary: The bmpcoreimage test in user32:cursoricon fails on most Windows versions Product: Wine Version: 6.10 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: user32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com The bmpcoreimage test in user32:cursoricon fails on most Windows versions. The failure is either: cursoricon.c:1217: Test failed: BMP (coreinfo): IMAGE_BITMAP failed. or cursoricon.c:1162: Test failed: BMP (coreinfo): Pixel is 0x00000000 https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#user32:cursoricon A given Windows version can have different results. The result seems to depend on the user32.dll version, as if Microsoft issued a security fix that changed the handling of this bitmap and progressively converged on the "Pixel is 0" result. Here's the detailed result per platform and user32 version: vista 6.0.6002.18005 ok vistau64 6.0.6002.18005 ok w2008 6.0.6002.19714 ok w7pro64 6.1.7601.23594 ok w7u 6.1.7601.24546 Pixel is 0x00000000 w8 6.3.9600.17031 ok w864 6.3.9600.17031 ok w8.gtx 6.3.9600.17415 ok w8.rx 6.3.9600.19920 Pixel is 0x00000000 w1507 10.0.10240.16384 ok w1507.gtx 10.0.10240.16384 ok w1507.rx 10.0.10240.16384 ok w1607 10.0.14393.0 ok w1709.rx 10.0.16299.15 ok w1709 10.0.16299.125 ok w1709.gtx 10.0.16299.125 ok w1809.gtx 10.0.17763.168 ok w1809.rx 10.0.17763.168 ok w1809 10.0.17763.1339 IMAGE_BITMAP failed w1909.gtx 10.0.18362.719 IMAGE_BITMAP failed w1909.rx 10.0.18362.719 IMAGE_BITMAP failed w1909 10.0.18362.1110 Pixel is 0x00000000 w2004 10.0.19041.388 IMAGE_BITMAP failed w2009.fg 10.0.19041.610 Pixel is 0x00000000 w2009 10.0.19041.685 Pixel is 0x00000000 w2009.gtx 10.0.19041.906 Pixel is 0x00000000 w2009.rx 10.0.19041.906 Pixel is 0x00000000 Note that w1507, w1607 and w1709 may be missing updates (but installing them without upgrading to the next Windows version would be hard), which may be why they don't fail. So either this test should be removed, or it should be changed to expect 'pixel == 0' and allow for broken results (which does not fit with the way test_LoadImageFile() is currently implemented). We may also want to update Wine's BITMAP_Load() implementation to match the current Windows behavior. For reference this test bitmap was introduced in the commit below: commit 0dfedd50c38356c8049aef48e69b630204de0f79 Author: Wolfram Sang <wolfram(a)the-dreams.de> AuthorDate: Sat Jun 5 05:57:19 2010 +0200 user32: No sanity checks for BITMAPCOREINFO in BITMAP_Load. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 19471] New: Earthworm Jim 3D: Extensive graphics errors
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19471 Summary: Earthworm Jim 3D: Extensive graphics errors Product: Wine Version: 1.1.26 Platform: PC-x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ezekiel000(a)lavabit.com Created an attachment (id=22632) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=22632) Terminal output. While running Earthworm Jim 3D the background to the title screen and intro video/scene are black and during the game there are various graphics errors including: missing textures, corrupt textures, low quality textures. There are also quite a few 3D model animation errors. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 32

[Bug 10845] New: Application Menu doesn't work
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10845 Summary: Application Menu doesn't work Product: Wine Version: 0.9.51. Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: wine-misc AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: gizmo.gentoo(a)gmx.de In Propellerheads Reason 3.0 and 4.0 the application menu doesn' work. This affects, in my experience, all versions >wine-0.9.46 or 0.9.47. The problem is that i can't give you log files or something else, because there's no error message. It's just that u click on the menu and nothing happens. You can download a demo version from the software here: http://www.propellerheads.se/download/index.cfm?fuseaction=download_reason_… Let me know if i can do something to provide more information. thanks, marc -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 34

[Bug 53290] New: app is installed but doenst appear
by WineHQ Bugzilla 22 Jan '25

22 Jan '25

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53290 Bug ID: 53290 Summary: app is installed but doenst appear Product: Wine Version: 7.11 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: steurgo(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 72655 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72655 it shows the error message downloaded the app from your website and followe all the steps. now if i check in the ubuntu softwere it says its installed, but doesnt appear in the app list. when i try to uninstall if from ubuntu softwere it says there are no files to delete -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs April 2023