http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |julliard(a)winehq.com
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2004-01-01 08:15 -------
alexandre, please apply. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826
------- Additional Comments From the-fallen(a)web.de 2004-01-01 04:57 -------
I now have wine 20031212 and the errors have changed a bit, but im still unable
to install it. I nomore get the errors about my wineregistry but the errors
about the stream implemention keep running. Does this help in any way?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918
------- Additional Comments From dl4gbe(a)hotmail.com 2004-01-01 02:45 -------
I included the source code in Bug 1917
It's the same test program!
Please check test.c for the following lines:
case ID_FILE_EXIT:
// This does not work with wine!!!
PostMessage(hwnd,WM_CLOSE,0,0);
// This works!!!
//DestroyWindow(hwnd);
//PostMessage(hwnd,WM_DESTROY,0,0);
break;
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923
Summary: There's no EOVERFLOW on OpenBSD.
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: OpenBSD
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-patches
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: wiml(a)hhhh.org
This patch is needed to compile wine-20031212 on OpenBSD 3.4. (All of OBSD's
documented errno possibilities for fcntl(F_SETFL) are already handled in
set_unix_lock().)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922
Summary: [wine-20031212] there's no sipx_zero field on OpenBSD
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: OpenBSD
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-ports
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: wiml(a)hhhh.org
ws_sockaddr_ws2u(), in dlls/winsock/socket.c, tries to zero out the sipx_zero
field of the newly created sockaddr_ipx. This fails to build on OpenBSD since
that field doesn't exist. I've attached a patch which should fix the problem.
(It compiles successfully on my machine with the patch, though I don't have a
good way to see if it functions correctly.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.