wine-bugs

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
158871 discussions

[Bug 1011] Can't Work In Lycoris Desktop/LX
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:31 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: G'day Everyone, I'm having some problem trying to install codeweaver-wine in Lycoris Desktop/LX. It tells me that the XFree86 lib or sumthin like that is incompatible. Apparently, Lycoris uses version .025 while mandrake uses version .023 So it works well with Mandrake but not in Lycoris. Could you guyz be of much assisatnce to me?. I'm actually writing from a company in Malaysia that serves many of the bluechip companies over here. I sincerely hope you guyz could look into the matter ASAP asI need to do a roll out on the 15.9.2002 and I need to be well prepared before that. Thanx for the help. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1009] Character set of filenames is wrong in Russia
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:28 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: WINE almost correctly uses charset cp1251 for text in Russia. The only place it takes incorrect is filenames. If I fire an open dialog, I get Russian filenames wrong. To reproduce this kind of distortion in a web browser (just for me to explain easily what it is), create a file with text in koi8-r and view it as if it was in cp1251 - you will have exactly he same distortion of characters. In all places where a program displays the filename, I get the same distortion, but files are opened OK. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1010] Unhandled exception in VFP6R.DLL (Visual FoxPro 6)
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:28 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: I've been trying to install and run a simple Visual Fox Pro 6 application. At first, I was having trouble registering MSCAL.OCX. I solved that by adding the line "comcat"="builtin,native" to the DLLOverrides section of ~/.wine/config. The application installed, and all the components registered properly. But when I try to run the application, I'm immediately dropped to the debug window, with the following (final) statement: Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x0c0b4ce6). In 32-bit mode. 0x0c0b4ce6 (VFP6R.DLL.DllWinMain+0x5e1e9 in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\VFP6R.DLL): mov1 0x0(%eax),%eax ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:11 ------- I've gotten over this problem by setting "nt40", "win2k" or "winxp" as the Windoze version to imitate. The Visual FoxPro application now runs, although with "OLE exception errors". That's a completely different matter though, so I consider this particular case closed. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:24 ------- So you want to tell us that Visual FoxPro only runs on an NT-based Windows version (NT, Win 2000, XP) and never on a Win 9x system, right ? Or why else would you consider this bug to be closed ? ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-05 11:35 ------- No, that's not exactly the way I would interpret things. At least on Wine, Visual FoxPro "runs" when Wine is imitating NT40, W2K or WXP, but not when it's imitating W9x. It seems like a simple workaround. And I say "runs", because I'm still getting OLE exception errors. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:46 ------- Did you realize what you just said ? You said it's a *workaround*, not a bug fix. Thus this bug is still valid :) (as I'm damn sure that VFP *should* run on a Win 9x based system) Sounds like there's a problem with some Wine Win9x support code that's being run when the app decides to switch to Win9x mode instead of NT mode. So should that bug be reopened ? (please submit a --debugmsg +Relay log file in win9x mode in this case) ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-09-05 11:47 ------- Argl, I meant --debugmsg +relay ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-13 09:45 ------- Created an attachment (id=290) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=290&action=view) Debug messages when imitating Win 9x ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-13 09:46 ------- Created an attachment (id=291) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=291&action=view) More (but similar) debug messages when imitating Win 9x ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-13 09:47 ------- As Andreas Mohr pointed out, the bug persists when Wine imitates Win 9x, so it can't really be considered closed. ------- Additional Comments From oscar.valdez <at> plastipak.com.sv 2002-09-18 18:13 ------- When imitating Win9x and thus causing the unhandled exception, the debugger and it's bt command report: > Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x0000000 in 32-bit code (0x0c0b4ce6) > In 32-bit mode > 0x0c0b4ce6 (VFP6R.DLL.DllWinMain+0x5e1e9 in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\VFP6R.DLL): movl 0x0(%eax),%eax > Wine-dbg>bt > Backtrace: > 0 0x0c0b4ce6 (VFP6R.DLL.DllWinMain+0x5e1e9 in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\VFP6R.DLL) (ebp=405d664c) > 1 0x0c0f162e (VFP6R.DLL.DllOleInit+0x.6b8f in C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\VFP6R.DLL) (ebp=0000100f) ------- Additional Comments From aztecconsultants <at> java.fsbusiness.co.uk 2003-04-02 12:03 ------- I have to say that this bug is also to be found in Visual FoxPro 6.0 SP5 running under native Win2K SP3. It only occurs if you use an OCX control on a form. I believe that it is related to an OCX control firing internal events. When considering GPF faults with Visual FoxPro it is better to make sure that they do not occur on the native platform. FoxPro is single threaded (or stolen zero threaded during big SQL extracts!) so how it responds to underlying windows messages is very precarious. To date I have about 20 different variations of various unacknoledge Visual FoxPro GPFs. I have to work around then all during my Visual FoxPro development. I did report them via MS WWW site but noticed months later that they had no outstanding bugs with this horrid product so I stopped reporting them! I am now a Sun Java Certified programmer and hope never to have to deal with this FoxPro product again. Anton ------- Additional Comments From abdulet <at> x-mail.net 2003-06-06 06:04 ------- seems visual fox only works in a windowsNT wine installation/simulation look here for details http://appdb.winehq.com/appview.php?appId=296 S8^> -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1007] kernel32.dll.Heap32* functions unimplemented
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:24 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: ------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-08-30 19:43 ------- I am trying to get the client program for ParadisePoker.com running on wine. It was working until a few days ago when they distributed an updated version of the client. winedbg reports unimplemented function: kernel32.dll.Heap32ListFirst when I try to run it now. Looking at the spec file, I see that none of the Heap32* functions are implemented. I would like to help any way I can, but after reviewing the MSDN descriptions of the functions and some of the code involved in related functions such as CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, I think it may be a bit beyond what I currently know. Any tips are appreciated, and I would be happy to provide the debug info I've collected so far. Per Nystrom ------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-09-03 00:53 ------- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** ------- Additional Comments From centaur <at> netmagic.net 2002-09-04 23:55 ------- Here's abbreviated --debugmsg +relay output, though I'm not really sure if I've gotten the part where it starts to barf. I've done some more reading, and it sounds to me like CreateToolhelp32Snapshot and friends are typically used for Windows debugging (is this correct?) so maybe the real culprit is further up the chain. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 08c58100:Call user32.GetCursorInfo(422a6590) ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call x11drv.GetCursorPos(422a659c) ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret x11drv.GetCursorPos() retval=00000134 ret=408279ad 08c58100:Ret user32.GetCursorInfo() retval=00000001 ret=40c743a4 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call user32.GetQueueStatus(000000bf) ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Ret user32.GetQueueStatus() retval=00000000 ret=40c743d0 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() ret=40c73473 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetCurrentThreadId() retval=08c58100 ret=40c73473 08c58100:Call kernel32.FreeLibrary(407e0000) ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Ret kernel32.FreeLibrary() retval=00000001 ret=40c743f1 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7f0 "CreateToolhelp32Snapshot") ret=40c74401 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40677000 ret=40c74401 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7e4 "Heap32First") ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=4061771c ret=40c7440b 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7d8 "Heap32Next") ret=40c74417 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617770 ret=40c74417 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7c8 "Heap32ListFirst") ret=40c74423 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617738 ret=40c74423 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7b8 "Heap32ListNext") ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40617754 ret=40c7442d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe7a8 "Process32First") ret=40c74439 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d10 ret=40c74439 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe798 "Process32Next") ret=40c74445 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678d20 ret=40c74445 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe788 "Thread32First") ret=40c74451 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797c0 ret=40c74451 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe778 "Thread32Next") ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=406797d0 ret=40c7445d 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe768 "Module32First") ret=40c74469 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ad0 ret=40c74469 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetProcAddress(40610000,40cbe758 "Module32Next") ret=40c74475 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetProcAddress() retval=40678ae0 ret=40c74475 08c58100:Call kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot(0000000f,00000000) ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Ret kernel32.CreateToolhelp32Snapshot() retval=000000c4 ret=40c744f7 08c58100:Call kernel32.GetLastError() ret=00443683 08c58100:Ret kernel32.GetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=00443683 08c58100:Call kernel32.TlsGetValue(00000009) ret=00443691 08c58100:Ret kernel32.TlsGetValue() retval=41bd01e0 ret=00443691 08c58100:Call kernel32.SetLastError(00000002) ret=004436dd 08c58100:Ret kernel32.SetLastError() retval=00000002 ret=004436dd 08c58100:Call kernel32.UnhandledExceptionFilter(422a60a0) ret=00444eb6 08c58100:Call kernel32.IsBadCodePtr(7800b322) ret=00449078 08c58100:Ret kernel32.IsBadCodePtr() retval=00000000 ret=00449078 wine: Unhandled exception, starting debugger... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1006] CallNamedPipeA
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:22 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: I can see the following error while trying to execute Pervasive's iscout program to test Database interactivity over the network: fixme:win32:CallNamedPipeA "\\\\BTI-RICHARD\\PIPE\\BMKDE\\FUNCTION.PIP" 0x405d5e98 82 0x405d5fbc 82 0x405d6010 10000 fixme:netbios:Netbios NCBADDNAME fixme:netbios:Netbios NCBADDNAME Can I Fix this?. I've seen an error like this one with PeekNamedPipe Can you help me?. Thanks in advance ------------------ Pablo Abrile Informatica UNCPBA http://www.unicen.edu.ar -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1004] Error during Eudora Pro 4.2 installation
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: Attempting to install Eudora Pro 4.2, I got the following error popup: Eudora Pro Email 4.2 Setup An error occurred during the move data process: -160 Component: Eudora\Shared DLLs File Group: Shared DLLs File: Wininet.dll If you need more info, let me know what you want and how to generate it... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1003] random pixels in imagelist backgrounds
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:21 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: I first noted this in ACCPAC but have attached a minimal case that demonstrates the same problem. The issue requires a native comctl32.dll (specifically I used a Windows NT one). If an image list is created and no background is set (or, in the ACCPAC case if the background is not white) then random pixels appear in the background of the icon. I believe that this has to be something to do with the gdi and the bitmap code. ------- Additional Comments From billmedland <at> look.ca 2002-08-29 15:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=281) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=281&action=view) source for program demonstarting the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1002] fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_sscanf unhandled: %[
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002 ------- Additional Comments From z_god(a)wanadoo.nl 2003-23-06 05:20 ------- Bug comments restored from Gmane.org: As in title .... it was for string "-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859" and to mach "-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n" maches for [] paterns are not implemented. ------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42 ------- please be more specific in your bug report ------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:32 ------- Created an attachment (id=313) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=313&action=view) Wine log (shortened) ------- Additional Comments From michal.seliga <at> visicom.sk 2002-10-14 04:34 ------- I see the same message while installing game Incubation (it worked perfectly with wine version 20020605, it doesn't work now with 20021007) I sent wine log as attachment, I hope it will help U&zdot;ytkownik wine-bugs <at> winehq.com napisa&lstrok;: >http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002 > > > > > >------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon <at> yahoo.com 2002-10-12 19:42 ------- >please be more specific in your bug report > >DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT ><http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002>. >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > As i wrote function call looks like sscanf("-%30[^-]-%100[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%30[^-]-%n","-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859", ... rest of the line) runing program which contains this calls causes message "fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_sscanf unhandled: %[" I've looked in code and for me it looks like patterns [abc...z], [a-z], [^xgd] etc,etc are not handled at all. Jacek Bator ------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-02 02:37 ------- I have implemented the [ format specifier in the scanf functions, I havn't been able to look at the log because when I click on the link then it asks me it I wan't to save the showattachment.cgi. I suppose this bug should be closed, anyone? nog. ------- Additional Comments From nog <at> sdf.lonestar.org 2002-11-13 11:44 ------- I suppose I should have been more clear: Someone should close this bug. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:48 ------- Yep, closed. ------- Additional Comments From andi <at> rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-11-13 15:49 ------- Now close it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 mike(a)theoretic.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 ------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-06 05:00 ------- Looking again after my morning cup of tea, I think the problem is that timeGetTime always returns the same value: 0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec 0009:Ret winmm.timeGetTime() retval=00000e2a ret=004014ec etc I think the return figure should be ticking up, at least a little bit. Another suspect is this line: 0009:Call kernel32.Sleep(00000000) ret=00401527 0009:Ret kernel32.Sleep() retval=00000102 ret=00401527 A value of zero here means relinquish for the remainder of the timeslice. Maybe this is how it measures clockspeed, ms between timeslices? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

[Bug 1537] Wine reports 0 MHz CPU speed to applications
by Wine Bugs 23 Jun '03

23 Jun '03

http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537 ------- Additional Comments From khalek(a)scummvm.org 2003-23-06 04:54 ------- Created an attachment (id=293) --> (http://bugs.winehq.com/attachment.cgi?id=293&action=view) gzip'd text file of everything before "mhz" excluding CriticalSection calls Hopefully this attaches properly... I'm not sure exactly what may/may not be of interest so here is everything before and including the first "mhz" line, with Enter/LeaveCriticalSection calls filtered out. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs