http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:25 -------
Agreed. I can't find a bug about the ImageList error, should I file one or turn
this bug into it?
BTW, I can't search on descriptions, so I might have missed one. I think both
Mike McCormack and Vitolay were tracking this, so hopefully it'll be fixed soon.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:02 -------
If somebody can confirm this bug, it should be reopened. For now, it is useless.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=105>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 05:00 -------
No response, closing.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:59 -------
These messages can be ignored. What actually goes wrong? If no response in a few
weeks, this bug should be closed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:53 -------
Can you get a backtrace from the crash?
Also if you could put up the last 100 lines before the debugger starts in a
relay trace, that would be good also:
wine --debugmsg +relay uoassist.exe 2>relay.log
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:42 -------
Can you give us the exact error? That function appears to be a partial stub,
some parts are in fact implemented.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:40 -------
When you get a debug window, can you give a backtrace?
FWIW I have the Java JDK working just fine here, v1.4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347
Summary: Screen is wiped/blanked on usage of DirectDraw
Product: Wine
Version: 20030318
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-directx
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: mike(a)theoretic.com
Some desktop apps that use DirectDraw, such as Java Swing and QuickTime cause
the contents of the screen to be erased. Forcing a repaint, by dragging windows
around, or by switching to a VT and back to X, restores the screen to what it
should be. The only ddraw fixmes I can see are:
fixme:ddraw:Main_DirectDraw_SetCooperativeLevel (0x4027f258)->(00000000,00000008)
fixme:ddraw:Main_DirectDrawClipper_Initialize
(0x4027cc90)->(0x4027f264,0x00000000),stub!
fixme:ddraw:get_display_window clipper clip lists not supported
So presumably this is a problem with clipping?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:31 -------
Closing to get this off the bug radar. MacOS X is unlikely to happen, ever.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-03-27 04:30 -------
Closing, the bug is old with no updates. Also the threading stuff is changing
lately, presumably the use of internal functions will be removed as well.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.