http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-11-01 12:55 -------
sounds to me like that installer may have some copy protection like all of
westwood's installers do, and since we dont have copy protection implemented
this installer wont work...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1111>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-11-01 11:32 -------
Dimi had me add a couple of trace lines to the treeview code after the hack
patch. For some weird reason the installer is expecting unicode even though it
doesn't support it. He then asked me to add the patch to the code before Guy's
patch and when I went to do that I found out that Guy's patch is the one that
actually implements TREEVIEW_NotifyFormat so there was no way to do that.
Clip from email:
-begin-
--- "Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> wrote:
> On November 1, 2002 02:00 am, you wrote:
> > after banging my head on my keyboard for a few minutes
> > because i couldnt find treeview_notifyformat i went and looked at cvsweb
> > and found out...there is no treeview_notifyformat before guy's patch so
> > there is no way for me to get that kind of a debug output...
>
> Good find. Please add this to Bugzilla. But it presents a big problem:
> if we behave correctly, we break the app. What do we do?
>
I'm wondering if maybe its my app thats broken already and thats why its
sending the unicode message..
-end-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-11-01 00:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=326)
Debug log after the hacky patch is committed.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-11-01 00:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=325)
Hacky patch that works in case it doesn't get committed, this may break apps that send messages in unicode instead of ansi
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)yahoo.com 2002-10-31 23:58 -------
ok 20021031 was released, and i tested the new patch, it didnt work either. he
then priv emailed me a one-liner that worked. I am posting it here after the
NEW debug output
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-10-31 20:19 -------
The patch looks good to me so I'm sending it almost unchanged to wine-patches
(giving proper credit of course).
The only change I'm making (and thus submitting separately) is for
SM_CYMAXIMIZED. Actually I was wrong and it was still at -45 (I had based my
calculation on 1400 instead of 1440). Now, why -45?
The reason is that this value is based on a default Win95 installation which has
the 'Start Menu' at the bottom. But even on Windows the size of this menu bar
can vary (the user can resize it), and I have even seen users put it on the side!
On Linux it may be there or not be there depending on the Windows
manager/desktop (Gnome/KDE). Similarly its size changes from distribution to
distribution. So until we can query the window manager/desktop as to the actual
size of the reserved area I think we should just hard-code SM_CYMAXIMIZED at
'height of screen + 2 borders', just like for SM_CXMAXIMIZED.
And that's what I'm sending as the second patch.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116
Summary: Winrar 3.0: Problem with header control
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-patches
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: clozano(a)andago.com
If you open winrar, navigate by the directory until that you find a .zip file, and
you do doubleclick about the file, it will refresh the listbox and will should the list
of files what are included in the .zip, (almost correct because the icons are
buggy), but the problem is that a new "extra" header have been included in the
"header" control, it has now:
Name | Size | Packet | Type | Modified | CRC32 | Name
^^^^^^ <- this is duplicated!!!
Now if you click in the gold arrow and go back to the last seen folder, it does
refresh the listbox, but the "extra Name" doesn't disappear. It works fine with
comctl32 native.
Regards,
Carlos.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115
Summary: Pirch98: Rebar_Layout problem
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-patches
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: clozano(a)andago.com
When you run the program, it is NOT usable, it is repainting continually the
screen, and no one control works. It works fine with comctl32 native. The
problem looks like that happen in rebar, because it is giving some ERR messages:
err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=561, maxx=0, start=0, end=0
err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=565, maxx=0, start=0, end=0
err:rebar:REBAR_AdjustBands Phase 1 failed, x=565, maxx=0, start=0, end=0
If you add a "return;" to the start of the function REBAR_Layout, the rebar is
painted incorrectly, but the program can be used.
If you don't remove REBAR_Layout and only comment the last line of the
REBAR_Layout function
//REBAR_ForceResize (infoPtr);
Then the rebar are painted better (but no correct) and it is usable.
Regards,
Carlos.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.