http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96
This bug depends on bug 548, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548
fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-10-26 18:07 -------
This one is gone.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-10-26 16:00 -------
All that remains of the list is:
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Alloc'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Compact'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_CountFree'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Free'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_HeapSize'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Lock'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_ReAlloc'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Size'
./libuser32.so: undefined reference to `LOCAL_Unlock'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534
fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-10-26 15:58 -------
Yes, all these are gone so I am marking this bug as resolved.
The reason why you get a lot of errors when you remove gdi32 from the import
section is that, AFAIU, ttydrv should be allowed to call gdi32 but that it
should not call APIs that are not exported by the native gdi32.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96
This bug depends on bug 534, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=96>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2002-10-26 15:17 -------
These are gone:
SELECTOR_AllocBlock
SELECTOR_FreeBlock
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534
------- Additional Comments From jaco(a)puxedo.org 2002-10-26 11:49 -------
Is this one still valid? As described here, it seems that some things have been
changed. However, removing "gdi32" from the import section does result in other
undefined external references.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321
------- Additional Comments From jaco(a)puxedo.org 2002-10-26 08:45 -------
Patch submitted to wine-patches.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-25 05:19 -------
I was not quite clear there. I mean that I've experienced the problem myself.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100
johane(a)lysator.liu.se changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From johane(a)lysator.liu.se 2002-10-25 03:37 -------
I saw it too.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.