http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033
tazdev(a)altern.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From tazdev(a)altern.org 2002-11-20 09:47 -------
i cant reproduce it with current cvs version
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-11-19 10:27 -------
I have had dealings with Murphy myself. However as your time frame narrows
compile time _should_ go down since there are less changes.
I do regression testing on my 300 mhz machine a fair amount and I have a wine
tree and a regression tree. That way I can go from regression testing to an
up-to-date CVS in a matter of minutes.If you do development as well you could
have a development tree as well.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122
------- Additional Comments From frick(a)sc-networks.de 2002-11-19 04:50 -------
I just want to let you knwo, that i am working on it - but i usually can not do
more than 3 compile runs on my box per evening; i think i am close to the patch
- but have not found it yet (still surrender it per hour - binary search works
fine for computers; but not humans, because there is this guy named Murphy :))
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145
------- Additional Comments From hughes2002(a)btinternet.com 2002-11-18 15:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=338)
Patch for ntdll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145
------- Additional Comments From hughes2002(a)btinternet.com 2002-11-18 14:46 -------
Working on this...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126
ezra_daniel(a)hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |ezra_daniel(a)hotmail.com
------- Additional Comments From ezra_daniel(a)hotmail.com 2002-11-18 12:47 -------
This happens with Lotus Notes software
Lotus Domino Administrator is part of the Lotus Notes 5.x series
Another program which comes with Lotus Notes 5.x is Lotus Domino Designer.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147
------- Additional Comments From tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net 2002-11-18 10:48 -------
At this point in time you should send the patch to wine-patches(a)winehq.com . You
will get far more review of it there.
Please include a link to this bug report in your patch submission.
You should include a link here (in the Additional Comments:) to the patch in in
the wine-patches archive http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/ (this is
nice to do as it provides a good cross reference.).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
Summary: fixme: messages when trying to run Panzer Elite
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: tedkaz(a)optonline.net
Wine 20021031
Redhat 8.0
[tazman@nitremb21 tazman]$ wine "/mnt/cdrom/panzer_elite/panzer_elite.exe"
fixme:process:CreateProcessA (D:\panzer_elite\3d_control_center.exe,...):
NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS ignored
fixme:ddraw:Main_DirectDraw_SetCooperativeLevel (0x402b47a0)->(00010024,00000011)
fixme:ddraw:MESA_IDirect3D2Impl_CreateDevice
(0x402b4350)->({84e63de0-46aa-11cf-816f-0000c020156e},0x402b4e50,0x444408): stub
fixme:process:CreateProcessA (D:\panzer_elite\mymenu.exe,...):
NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS ignored
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155
Summary: setupapi.dll still not found - 16-bit dll or version
conflict
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: tedkaz(a)optonline.net
I get the above error when trying to load Panzer Elite.
Wine 20021031
Redhat 8.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147
------- Additional Comments From jdahlin(a)async.com.br 2002-11-18 06:47 -------
Since this is my first try to STRICT:ify a dll in wine i'm attaching it here for
review before sending to wine-patches.
If it's okay i'll continue and help with the other few dlls that's left.
One thing that worries me is if i should do:
if ((int)hInstance < 32)
or
if (hInstance < (HINSTANCE)32)
Except from that should the fact that it's compiling without warnings be enough,
shouldn't it?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.