http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2953
Summary: Java 1.5 dies running even trivial programs ("Truncated
class file")
Product: Wine
Version: 20050310
Platform: PC
URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?appId=1372
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: lamber45(a)cse.msu.edu
I can get the Java 1.5 JRE to report its version, as follows:
C:\Documents and Settings\davidl\src\ppldb>java -version
Warning: Language '' was not recognized, defaulting to English.
fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_signal (2 0x6d713283):stub
java version "1.5.0_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_02-b07)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_02-b07, mixed mode, sharing)
C:\Documents and Settings\davidl\src\ppldb>
However, I get the same exception whenever I try to use it to run .class
files (on NTFS or EXT2FS, it doesn't matter; the files run just fine with the
Linux JRE):
C:\Documents and Settings\davidl\src\csc5250>java -cp . propprint
Warning: Language '' was not recognized, defaulting to English.
fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_signal (2 0x6d713283):stub
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassFormatError: Truncated class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(Unknown Source)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(Unknown Source)
C:\Documents and Settings\davidl\src\csc5250>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2398
------- Additional Comments From phil(a)ldex.terica.net 2005-10-05 14:24 -------
Progress to date :
Wine CVS regression log: LW interface problems post-Jan112005
************************
20050111 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Runs without problems, except for the wineprefixcreate bug that needs to
be fixed by commenting out the avifil32.dll line in [RegisterDLLs]
20050125 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Creates .wine without complaint, unlike 20050111 CDT. Runs LW without
issue.
20050207 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Shows interface regression.
20050201 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Shows interface regression.
20050128 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine.
20050130 CDT
============
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine
20050131 00:00:01 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine
20050131 23:59:59 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Shows regression. We now have a ~24 hour period in which it broke.
20050131 12:00:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Shows regression.
Dialling in on the patch responsible.....12 hour window.
20050131 06:00:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine. Brought down to 6 hour window (0600-1200).
20050131 09:00:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine. Now have a 3 hour window (0900-1200).
20050131 10:30:00 CDT
=====================
No commit changes from 0900. Down to 1.5 hour window
20050131 11:00:00 CDT
=====================
No commit changes from 0900/1030. Down to 1 hour window.
20050131 11:30:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine. Down to 0.5 hour window (1130-1200).
20050131 11:45:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Shows regression. Down to 0.25 hour window (1130-1145).
20050131 11:37:00 CDT
=====================
No commit changes from 1145 so shows regression.
20050131 11:33:00 CDT
=====================
Commit changes from 1130.
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
Works fine. Down to 4 minutes (11:33-11:37)
20050131 11:34:00 CDT
=====================
No commit changes from 1133 so works fine.
20050131 11:35:00 CDT
=====================
Compiled with :
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
(currently compiling)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2952
Summary: URLs in comments get double-quoted, breaking them
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=1706
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: website-bugs
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: lamber45(a)cse.msu.edu
The source code for the linked page includes the following text:
<a HREF="<a href="http://packages.debian.org/testing/gnome/gramps>gramps</a>">
packages.debian.org/testing/gnome/gramps">gramps</a> </a>
The same thing happens to all other URLs that are entered in <A
HREF="...">...</A> form, instead of as plain text in URL syntax. Clicking on
the link in Mozilla displays a 404 error from WineHQ, and the following text is
displayed:
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=1706
The culprit seems to be the call to htmlify_urls() in include/comment.php. We
should either rewrite htmlify_urls() to not break existing properly-formatted
links, or at least add a clear coment in the instructions on that page.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
------- Additional Comments From djd20(a)kent.ac.uk 2005-10-05 09:08 -------
Nice one.
The app starts correctly once the deshrinker is run on mss32.dll. Now I just
have to go and find my MM6 disc 2... hmm.
Thanks!
Damian
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2951
adam(a)gimp.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |1434
nThis| |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2951
Summary: Second Life fails to launch (GL context problem?)
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
URL: http://secondlife.com
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-directx-d3d
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: adam(a)gimp.org
The recent OpenGL context fixes have fixed a variety of my GL apps, but not
Second Life:
-----
[...]
INFO Attempting to poll DirectX for hardware info
INFO CoCreateInstance IID_IDxDiagProvider
WARNING No DXDiag provider found! DirectX 9 not installed!
WARNING DX9 probe failed
INFO DirectX probe failed, alerting user.
INFO Done polling DirectX for hardware info
WARNING Unknown Windows major version 4, aborting detection!
INFO Detected VRAM: 0
WARNING Bad or missing vfx index file c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\index.db2.x.1
WARNING Removing old vfs data file c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\data.db2.x.1
INFO Renaming c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\data.db2.x.1 to c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\data.db2.x.12652
INFO Renaming c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\index.db2.x.1 to c:\windows\profiles\fox\Application
Data\SecondLife\cache\index.db2.x.12652
INFO Pre-sized VFS data file to 524288001 bytes
INFO Initializing window...
WARNING Couldn't find display mode 1024 by 768 at 32 bits per pixel
WARNING No ARB WGL render texture extensions
WARNING Error after wglChoosePixelFormatARB 32-bit
INFO Opening help/window_creation_error.html
INFO ShellExecute failure with 31
WARNING LLWindowManager::create() : Error creating window.
WARNING Unable to create window, be sure screen is set at 32-bit color in
Control Panels->Display->Settings
-----
I believe that SL prefers D3D9 and then falls back to OpenGL when it fails to
initialize D3D9. However, as you can see, it claims to then fail to find a
suitable GL context.
I attach the output of 'glxinfo' on this system.
Let me know if you want a particular trace. SL is a free download/trial if you
wish to try it yourself.
I'm filing this under 'wine-directx-d3d' since there doesn't seem to be an
opengl component.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2950
mteske(a)imagnos.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|richedit: Assertion size.cx |richedit: Assertion size.cx
|failed |failed
------- Additional Comments From mteske(a)imagnos.com 2005-10-05 05:57 -------
Just for testing, I removed the offending assert() and it seems to run again.
Ao, is there any reason for it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2842
fenix(a)club-internet.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.org |fenix(a)club-internet.fr
------- Additional Comments From fenix(a)club-internet.fr 2005-10-05 02:41 -------
Hi,
we have 3 pending patches to wine-patches to fix some OpenGL problems.
when they will be commited can you retry (with cvs) to check if it is fixed ?
Regards,
Raphael
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-10-05 01:16 -------
Now I hit the right bug, I hope.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2939
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.l
| |t
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-10-05 01:11 -------
*** Bug 2081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-10-05 01:11 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2939 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1973
------- Additional Comments From tonsofpcs(a)hotmail.com 2005-10-05 00:03 -------
Has anyone tested Mirage 1.5 [free upgrade from 1.0, now has 30 day full trial] yet?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
inverseparadox(a)comcast.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |inverseparadox(a)comcast.net
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 23:52 -------
...um, did you somehow miss reading the "comment by" lines? The bug description
and first comment were posted in December of '04 by one "Damian", but the others
were all posted in May of '05 by you and me. I'm the user you mentioned who has
MM6 running; I'm telling you that the way I got it running was to use DeShrinker
on that same DLL after receiving the same or a very similar error.
If I could, I'd mark this bug as confirmed; the actual bug is that, unlike
Windows (or at least some versions of Windows - there are complaints from XP
users), Wine does not sucessfully run the Shrinker-compressed code.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 23:47 -------
I can't believe I made a mistake like that! I even remember looking at the
attachments after uploading, to make sure they were correct... but when I follow
the "correct behaviour" link now, the image definitely does depict the correct
behaviour (decorations not visible).
And actually, I was unclear about the resolution change. The resolution changes
under Wine just as it does under Windows; that is the correct behaviour, and
that's how it behaves. Where the difference lies is in what is and is not
possible to do after the resolution has already been changed.
Under Windows, you can do three things: a) keep going (i.e. play the game) at
the new resolution; b) use the game's Exit command to quit the game, which
restores the previous resolution; or c) use Alt-Tab to switch out of the game
and back to the rest of the OS (which also restores the previous resolution, and
minimizes the game into the Taskbar).
Under Wine, you can still do both a) and b), and you could presumably use
Alt-Tab to switch to a background window if you wanted to. But switching focus
in that way would *not* automatically change resolution, nor would it minimize
(iconify) the game window until you tried to give that window the focus again.
Under my system's configuration (I don't know how universal it is), the
resolution change involved in a) and b) under Wine is done simply by reducing
the size of the viewport. Under that same configuration, when the resolution of
the current viewport is smaller than the resolution of the current desktop,
moving the mouse pointer to an edge of the viewport which is not also an edge of
the desktop will 'scroll' the viewport in that direction. This latter effect,
while not always desirable, has no corresponding functionality under Windows.
Additionally, under my system configuration (and probably most others), I can
use Ctrl-Alt-NumpadPlus to switch my viewport to the next lower resolution
listed in my X config file; similarly, I can use Ctrl-Alt-NumpadMinus to switch
to the next higher resolution (if there is no higher/lower resolution to switch
to, it wraps around to the opposite end of the list). This means that I can
change the resolution myself, independent of what MM6 wants to do; I do it not
infrequently, to consult and edit notes I've made during gameplay.
I don't use icons since I moved to Linux, and I don't minimize/iconify windows;
I would not like for the only way to switch out of MM6 without terminating the
program to be to make the window disappear like that, since my preferred Linux
desktop style does not include a taskbar of any sort (and thus it'd be rather
hard to get the window back). For window manager configurations which aim to
more closely resemble the Windows look and feel, and as such include a taskbar,
it might arguably be desirable to mimic the Windows behaviour in this instance -
but I don't know of any way, short of a user-set configuration option, for Wine
to reliably tell whether or not the environment in which it is being used is
meant to that closely resemble Windows.
I also wouldn't like to see the ability to switch resolutions whenever and
however I like go away.
On top of all possible undesirability issues, I'm fairly sure that there is no
practical way for Wine to enforce the Windows style for most of these
behaviours; furthermore, the only one for which I think it might be potentially
desirable is the 'scroll the viewport by moving the mouse pointer' one, and on
that I think it likely that - at least in my case - the loss of the ability to
go look at other programs without quitting MM6 would more than offset the
decreased aggravation of needing to avoid accidentally scrolling the viewport.
Part of the issue here is that this is not purely a matter of how the Windows
program behaves, but also a matter of how it interacts with the surrounding OS
interface. Windows provides certain rules and a certain framework for how
programs can behave; any given *nix environment does the same thing, but unlike
under Windows, there is no guarantee that any two *nix systems will provide the
same framework and the same rules. The way MM6 behaves under Windows makes sense
for Windows' framework and rules, but it does not necessarily make sense for all
of the frameworks and rules possible on various *nix systems, and I do not think
it is sane to try to enforce it on them.
(This sounds more like the sort of philosophy argument that I'd expect to find
on a project's development list...)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-09-05 23:22 -------
How strange. There is another unrelated bug pertaining to this same game, and
that user is able to get it running, but it won't close when he tried to exit
the game.. See bug 2947, and bug 2939..
I will come back to this one as soon as I get his problem fixed (calls are taken
in the order received lol..)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-09-05 23:10 -------
Now I'm thoroughly confused lol..
You say that the titlebars appear at 3:15, and the game does not hang..
Quote:
In the version from 3:15 4/27, the window is positioned incorrectly (the
decorations are visible) and the game does not hang on exit.
And that the titlebar disappears at 3:19, and the game does hang..
Quote:
In the 3:19 4/27 version, the window is positioned correctly (the decorations
are not visible) and the game does hang on exit.
SO.. I think we got a little backwards, because the pictures are named
differently.. The 1:39 pic is named correct, and does not show the titlebar,
the 1:41 pic is named incorrect and does show the titlebar..
See how I got confused?
SO.. I am now wondering whether the picures were named wrong when you saved
them to disk, and because the names were wrong you typed the summary wrong, or
if this most recent clarification was wrong due to a lack of sleep ;-)..
Let me know.
About the flexibility of Linux, that is not a feature of wine or Linux, it is a
bug. wine is designed to mimic windows, so if the game changes the resolution
to 640x480 and therefore makes it's window take the full screen in Windows, wine
should do the same, but thats the subject of YAB..... :-\
Waiting on your re-clarification ;-)
Dustin
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 19:49 -------
Just as a note: yes, MM6 does come with this DLL already "shrink"ed. Before I
used the attached program, DeShrinker, to decompress it, I could not run MM6
either. I've just tested with the still-compressed version, and yes, current CVS
still cannot run MM6 with the compressed version of the DLL.
I hadn't explicitly thought of filing a bug about the need to support 'shrink'ed
DLLs (and EXEs, since they can be similarly compressed), but it does sound like
a good idea; part of the reason I had provided a copy of DeShrinker was as a
possible resource to help people figure out how to produce a similar effect
on-the-fly.
(Note that the URL needs to be corrected, to AppDB entry 1070 - currently it
points to entry 1229, which is Heroes of Might and Magic IV, which is not the
same game at all.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 19:32 -------
No, that's not correct. For one thing, it's "hang", not "crash" - and for
another, you have it backwards.
In the version from 3:15 4/27 (AM, not PM - the times given are in 24-hour
clock), the window is positioned incorrectly (the decorations are visible) and
the game does not hang on exit.
In the 3:19 4/27 version, the window is positioned correctly (the decorations
are not visible) and the game does hang on exit.
The only reason I brought the issue up here is because the undesirable behaviour
disappeared when the bug appeared, and I wanted to be sure people knew that
(some ways of) fixing the bug might reintroduce the misbehaviour. I think it's
worth keeping the relevant information at hand, since currently the misbehaviour
does not exist on its own or in affiliation with any other reportable bug. If
you were correct that the misbehaviour still existed, alongside the hang-on-exit
bug, then a separate bug with a dependency would be correct - but as things
stand I don't think it's the right way to do this, though I'll admit I don't
know much about these practices yet.
The game does not display title bar (etc.) in Windows, for the simple reason
that it is not possible under Windows to have the game window non-minimized
while the viewport is displaying anything other than what is inside that window;
when you switch out of the game by Alt-Tab or similar, the game minimizes to the
Taskbar (switching back to normal resolution in the process), and when you
switch back to that window the resolution changes to 640x480 and the viewport
becomes fixed.
Under my Linux system (I don't know which parts of it this depends on), if I
have the viewport resolution smaller than the desktop resolution, moving the
pointer to a side of the viewport will scroll it in that direction, within the
limits of the size of the desktop. I like the additional options I get under
Linux (change resolutions up and down on my own, switch out of the game window
but leave it displayed, etc.), since they give me more convenient access to text
editors (etc.) for note-taking, but they are not consistent with the way the
program behaves under Windows; I'm not sure they need to be, either, though I
know others may disagree.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2932
------- Additional Comments From spamtrap475rsd(a)wanadoo.fr 2005-09-05 18:17 -------
OK, I would be interested that you walk me through a regression test.
Maybe on wednesday after about 4pm (at midnight in France) ? I did set up a
jabber account for instant messaging.
I installed the sources (Wine-20041201.tar.gz) and wine-cvsdirs-20041201.tar.gz
(but I warn you : I know nothing about CVS !).
I compiled the sources and tried the resulting program. Pasting to OpenOffice
works well with this version.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-09-05 17:15 -------
I'm guessing that the CVS at 3:15pm on 4/27 does not show the decorations, and
therefore crashed when closing, but
the CVS at 3:19pm on 4/27 DOES show the decorations, and therefore does NOT
crash when closing.
Correct?
Does the game display the titlebar when running it windowed, in Windows? If
that is the case, then yes this would be an issue that would need to be fixed
(and probably will be once we get finished with the windowing rewrite). But
then the game may crash on closing once that happens..
SO
We need another bug for the window decorations.. I will invalidate the 2
attachments here, and depend this bug on the one that you open for that issue,
once you get it open. Then just attach those 2 attachments to that bug..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-09-05 16:55 -------
What release of wine are you using (if not CVS)? MM 6 should be working fine,
as other bugs were recently fixed relating to this game. From your description,
it seems as though you are saying that MM6 comes with this dll already
"shrinked". If that is the case, then please try the recent CVS version of
wine, or wait until the May release.. That should get it running, although it
doesn't close properly.
If it came not shrinked, and you did that yourself, then the obvious solution
would be to just unshrink it, and dont use that program anymore. Of course a
bug filed about dlls not loading that are "shrinked" would be nice too, but not
necessary.
Leaving open for now, so I can see your response.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2840
us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk
------- Additional Comments From us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk 2005-09-05 16:50 -------
I've been debugging UT2003 since wineconf and although I know whats going on,
I dont know the proper fix. However, as a test, try changing the user32
\painting.c routine update_now, so a break occurs after all the processing in
the case where child==prev.
BTW I've also sent this to wine-devel
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2005/05/0420.html
I dont know if its the same problem as yours, but if you have cvs to play
with, its worth trying.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2897
------- Additional Comments From lamber45(a)cse.msu.edu 2005-09-05 16:23 -------
I can't get WinRAR (3.30 evaluation version, Spanish localization, on Wine
20050310 with Win2k stuff in the path, XFree86 Version 3.3.6a) to duplicate this
behavior. There are a few visual glitches, etc., but I haven't seen it crash
or corrupt data. Have you tried with a newer version of Wine (I compile my own
and use it on Debian Stable) or a different X server?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2931
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-09-05 15:48 -------
Got it, I am sending a note to the developers now. A quick note though, usually
it's easier (for future reference) if you just provide a link to the commit
email in the wine-cvs hypermail archives, so that they can tell what time it
happened at, and who the patch was written by, since alexandre julliard is the
only person allowed to make commits.
If you could provide that link here, it would be great, but it isnt required.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1883
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |ABANDONED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 15:26 -------
no feedback
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1762
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 15:25 -------
I fixed more problems now... it will go further now.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2696
------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2005-09-05 13:24 -------
Stock RH 7.3 comes with an old version of Freetype which may cause problems with
Wine's TrueType rendering, though I thought that Wine would automatically detect
this and not use the Truetype fonts in that case. There were no messages printed
out on the console?
You might want to provide the Version number displayed by:
rpm -qi freetype
I'm not sure where you came up with the ~/.fonts directory. I have not heard of
that being used in Wine before. You might try setting an environment variable:
WINEDEBUG = font
and then try running something, and see if any printed messages might give a
clue to what is going on.
But of course the best thing is to upgrade from RH 7.3 to something that is not
ancient ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2696
------- Additional Comments From jwagner(a)hankgraff.com 2005-09-05 12:27 -------
I was using it directly through X on the console of the machine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2149
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-09-05 12:18 -------
Note that this is _not_ a dupe of 1798 - 1798 is about fullscreen apps only -
here we are talking about the fact that "normal" windows don't get any keyboard
focus when run in unmanaged mode. (So the workaround is probably to switch to
managed mode and not desktop mode (although it will obviously fix it too))
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2779
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-09-05 12:10 -------
First issue: A dupe of 2149.
Second issue: Commited to CVS, fixed.
Close?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
------- Additional Comments From samuellb(a)bredband.net 2005-09-05 08:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=868)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=868&action=view)
Patch for edit controls
- The brush returned in WM_CTLCOLOREDIT is used for painting the background
(didn't work due to a bug (?) in FillRect. Fixed with SelectObject). If it's a
pen its converted to a brush.
- If there's no text background selected with SetBkColor it uses the same color
as the background brush.
- The border is visible and is black if WS_BORDER is set (didn't work due to
missing SelectObject).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2942
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 07:39 -------
hmm, there are still some ishield issues open still. :/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2942
------- Additional Comments From jo(a)sferacarta.com 2005-09-05 07:28 -------
No, Marcus. It doesn't install.
The installShield Wizard starts decompression, the gauge show the progression
until the end but at this point it locks and I have to break it.
Jo
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1955
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 07:11 -------
solved by using our own elf loader... :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1774
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |ABANDONED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 07:10 -------
no feedback
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2606
------- Additional Comments From jestock(a)nutextonline.com 2005-09-05 07:06 -------
Unfortunatelly I do not have any debugging output. This message is coming from
the game Call of Duty directly, however network connectivity does not work for
any game with wine under FreeBSD. This is with the TCP/IP protocol.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2450
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:56 -------
the script no longer exists ... so it has no bugs anymore :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2490
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:47 -------
i think we can consider this issue closed?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2459
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:46 -------
we need more information
please try again with a current release and if possible
with debugger backtrace or similar.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:44 -------
no feedback, assuming fixed
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2576
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:42 -------
how much memory do you have in the machine and how much swap?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2612
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:41 -------
not blocking... just a normal bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2606
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:40 -------
please add more debug output, +winsock or similar.
is this IPX or TCP/IP or UDP/IP nettraffic?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2588
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:24 -------
i would like to see a backtrace of the crash itself (not attached).
also please try the current release, several installshield fixes
were done.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2626
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:22 -------
hmm, should work.
please try again and look for earlier failures during oaidl_p.c compile
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2638
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:21 -------
is applied
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2868
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:20 -------
is fixed in current cvs
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Install problem |Install problem
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:20 -------
what are the lines before the Error 1?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2942
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 06:09 -------
where is the bug? all those are more or less harmless warnings.
did it install?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2930
flicker-winehq(a)anduin.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From flicker-winehq(a)anduin.net 2005-09-05 05:11 -------
Bug has been resolved in latest version of wine on CVS as of 8th May 2005.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2806
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:21 -------
not blocking, no feedback received ... so close.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:19 -------
make sure you install cups-devel during compilation, as last comment said.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2696
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:18 -------
are you using some kind of remote display? or local display only?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
haveaniceday(a)online.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From haveaniceday(a)online.de 2005-09-05 04:13 -------
Hope it's right if I close.
no wine problem.
Christian
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2657
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:13 -------
will be fixed later. please check again from time to time
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
haveaniceday(a)online.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
------- Additional Comments From haveaniceday(a)online.de 2005-09-05 04:13 -------
checked the order of the start: cups first. nfsserver later.
accept this.
Thanks for the fast answer !
Christian
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2670
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:11 -------
can you check if your kernel has 32bit emulation enabled. "Pure64" sounds
like it doesnt have it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1840
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:09 -------
now supported.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2724
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:08 -------
no feedback, assuming assumption is correct, so wontfix
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2694
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:06 -------
Please make sure that you dont have other version of wine in /usr/lib/wine/
installed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
marcus(a)jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From marcus(a)jet.franken.de 2005-09-05 04:04 -------
this is a distro bug and has been fixed by some of those already.
WINE also cannot do anything since we just use the cups client libraries.
-> invalid
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949
Summary: DOS in combination with cups/nfsserver rpc.mountd
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: wine-winelib
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: haveaniceday(a)online.de
I had multiple the following situation:
- nfsserver ( rpc.mountd ) started first
- random port number used by rpc.mountd: 631 ( cups-port )
- wine hangs due to miscommunication with rpc.mountd => no start of wine
This is no real "wine" error ! Workaround for me: add fixed port to rpc.mountd
But I suggest to "harden" wine against wrong "cups port answers". rpc.mountd
listen on port 631 should not result in a permanent denial of start.
This problem might be hard to be found remotely on a beginners system.
Best regards,
Christian
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2931
------- Additional Comments From rmh(a)debian.org 2005-09-05 03:30 -------
Got it. The commit that broke wine was done between 23:45 and 23:59 (i'm not
sure wether UTC or my timezone, UTC+2). I don't need to track it down to the
last second because this is the only commit in that interval (made by julliard).
The patch that caused this regression is attached. I've verified that the patch
can be reverted cleanly on current CVS, and once reverted wine works again for
the Diablo 2 installer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
inverseparadox(a)comcast.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://appdb.winehq.org/appv
| |iew.php?appId=1070
Severity|normal |minor
Priority|P2 |P3
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 03:06 -------
I don't have any logs from Might and Magic VII test runs, I haven't tried it in
months; I was planning on trying again after I finished replaying Might and
Magic VI, and inquiring about the problem if it still existed then. If you like,
I could indeed go far enough out of my way to create basic run-logs now - but
note that I've never yet managed to get winedebug to do anything but sit there.
(For the record, no bugs citing MM7 are currently in the database.)
I've added to this bug the URL to the game's entry in the application database,
which I'll note is out of date - if a certain DLL on which the game relies is
decompressed (unnecessary under some/most versions of Windows, though XP users
have had problems), the game will run all but perfectly under Wine. (Plus the
game-site URL in the entry is no longer correct; that domain doesn't even exist
anymore.)
I've also corrected the severity rating, in line with the descriptions at the
relevant link, and downgraded the priority - while a fix would definitely be
nice, this isn't particularly critical.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 02:50 -------
I encountered this problem or a very similar one myself, and after a certain
amount of Googling found the cause. It is indeed related to either Shrinker or a
program with a similar name; the program in question claims to compress Windows
executable code in such a way that it remains 100% transparently executable.
While this may well be the case under Windows (I had no problem running the same
copy of MM6 before my own switch), it does not seem to be the case under Wine.
In the course of my Googling I found a program called deshrinker, which is
capable of decompressing executable files compressed in this way; after I
decompressed the DLL, Might and Magic VI ran perfectly fine under Wine.
I believe I downloaded the program from
ftp://ftp.sac.sk/pub/sac/pack/dshrnk16.zip
but it might not remain there indefinitely; where else it might be found I don't
know. I have provided the same .zip file as an attachment to this bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536
------- Additional Comments From dmitry(a)codeweavers.com 2005-09-05 02:49 -------
Is there any real misbehaviour except that FIXME message? Btw that FIXME was
replaced by a WARN in the recent Wine snapshots to not confuse the users.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2919
------- Additional Comments From bigblackpapa(a)hotmail.com 2005-09-05 02:25 -------
Thanks Dustin Navea
I have done a ScreenShot of the NotePad. It appear the same whatever the version
I choose (Notepad from Wine (any version), Notepad from Win XP)
http://www.geocities.com/bigblackpapa/notepad.png
The font is strange. Maybe it can help...
Bbp
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 01:41 -------
Created an attachment (id=865)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=865&action=view)
The incorrect window behaviour, seen before this bug was present
This is in relation to the sub-issue that there is an undesirable behaviour
which disappeared at the same time as when the bug appeared. This screenshot
displays the incorrect behaviour: the window is positioned in such a way that
the window manager decorations on the left and top sides are visible.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From inverseparadox(a)comcast.net 2005-09-05 01:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=864)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=864&action=view)
The correct window behaviour, seen when this bug is present
This is in relation to the sub-issue that there is an undesirable behaviour
which disappeared at the same time as when the bug appeared. This screenshot
displays the correct behaviour: the window is positioned in such a way that the
window manager decorations on the left and top sides are located off of the
desktop.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2930
------- Additional Comments From psi(a)mikrotik.com 2005-09-05 01:03 -------
I have the same bug with the same configuration.
user@debian:~/Desktop/share$ wine winbox.exe
X Error of failed request: BadShmSeg (invalid shared segment parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 142 (MIT-SHM)
Minor opcode of failed request: 2 (X_ShmDetach)
Segment id in failed request: 0x2200017
Serial number of failed request: 2063
Current serial number in output stream: 2095
Wine failed with return code 1
user@debian:~/Desktop/share$ wine --version
Wine 20050419
Wine exited with a successful status
user@debian:~/Desktop/share$
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 22:54 -------
Vogel, can you attach a screenshot of how it is supposed to look as well
(perhaps from a windows install), and try the patch listed in the comment above
this one to see if it makes any difference.
Confirming per screenshot..not a configuration issue as far as i can tell
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
------- Additional Comments From felix.nawothnig(a)t-online.de 2005-08-05 21:13 -------
The testapp is no longer available. (404)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2932
------- Additional Comments From spamtrap475rsd(a)wanadoo.fr 2005-08-05 17:33 -------
(back from the weekend)
I have never tried these manipulations before, but am willing to try.
I will try alone a bit and contact you if I have some problems.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1434
Bug 1434 depends on bug 2131, which changed state.
Bug 2131 Summary: 16-bit games bundled with windows fail to load (freecell, solitaire)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2131
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2131
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 16:14 -------
Seems to me that this is a WONTFIX situation. It is a known bug, but due to the
way microsoft structured their cards.dll we cant have a 16- and 32-bit cards.dll
that can peacefully coexist without incident. Best I can say is to get a 32-bit
version of the game(s) from win2k/xp and use the builtin cards.dll.
Sorry.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-08-05 15:41 -------
> it would be nice to have a test case but I do not know if it would help
> (as Windows only tells 'you will get the default frequency for this mode' - and
> so the question would be 'what do they mean by default ?').
Yes, and that's the thing which should be discovered when writing the regression
tests. Isn't it possible? Nevermind, I will try to play on being in
appropriate mood myself.
BTW, I think Windows also accepts a value of 1 instead of 0 (according to MSDN).
> I would have sorted the modes by descending refresh frequency so we would always
> have choosen the highest one when asking for the default frequency.
Nice, thanks for that, Lionel.
Dustin, I see I am tired. It was bug 2939 I meant. How can I revert my last
changes in the bug report?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2919
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:40 -------
Yes, you are right, the 64-bit processors are able to run 32-bit apps just fine,
which indicates (since you are using 32-bit linux) that it is not a problem with
the processor, but merely a bug in wine (which is usually easier to fix lol).
As far as make check, a lot of the tests are known to be problematic at best, so
they arent really a good way to find a problem with your computer. Looks like it
is crashing in the kernel, from the backtrace you put in the first post. Ill
forward this bug to the developers..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:34 -------
ok. You pretty much have it down. Obviously, the URL should be either a url to
the game/program on the web, or (preferred) a link to the game/program in the
AppDB.. Summary is just that, a summary of the problem, so if you only notice
it in one program, go ahead and put that program's name in there, as you did.
Keywords can be found by clicking on the keywords link.. Usually regression if
we determine that a bug is a regression, download if someone posts a link to the
game's download in the comments (which is the preferred place for those), and so
forth.
As far as attachments, yes, screenshots are acceptable as attachments (just make
sure to choose the right type). In general if you need more information, just
ask the reporter to attach their log or screenshot or whatever to the bug. And
yes, 2 screenshots are better than 1.. Compressed attachments are ok, as long as
it is a widely used compression format (zip, tarball, gzip, bzip2, tar.gz, etc)
Of course some people dont get what you mean by attach, so most of the time I
will say "Please attach (not copy and paste) ..." and most of the time the 500
lines before and after the crash are all that is needed for a log (when it's a
crash), and the backtrace from winedebug if they are able to get it. When its
not a crash, I just have them run the program with the necessary WINEDEBUG=
commands and have them do whatever they do that causes the problem and then
close the program, so the logs for that are usually small, but sometimes not.. lol
Anyways
Once you attach them, I will know, and take a look.
If you want, you can check for MM7 bugs, and add to one that exists if it is
related, or open a new one. I will take a look at any logs you might have..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:33 -------
Resolving properly.. FIXED Dont forget about comment #9 though.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
Speeddymon(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:31 -------
This is NOT a dupe of 2947, and 2947 is not a dupe of this one.. 2947's problem
is that the program does not close (or crashes when doing so).. This one's
problem is that the program wont run (or crashes when doing so).. Reopening bug..
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Summary: WM_CTLCOLOREDIT & LISTBOX return ignored and pen bug
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
URL: http://hem.bredband.net/lidsam/wm_ctlcolor.tar.bz2
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: wine-gdi
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: samuellb(a)bredband.net
Wine ignores the return value of WM_CTLCOLOREDIT and WM_CTLCOLORLISTBOX
messages. Also it uses any pens selected in WM_CTLCOLOREDIT for drawing the border.
The correct behaviour is to use select the brush returned in the messages, and
to draw the border on EDIT controls with the color theme's border color.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2938
------- Additional Comments From Speeddymon(a)gmail.com 2005-08-05 15:15 -------
Hmm.. Seems that the patch in question does not cause it, as it was committed
after the _march_ release.. Ill forward this bug to the devel list.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
------- Additional Comments From lionel.ulmer(a)free.fr 2005-08-05 14:49 -------
Well, it would be nice to have a test case but I do not know if it would help
(as Windows only tells 'you will get the default frequency for this mode' - and
so the question would be 'what do they mean by default ?'). But then it would
not be a DirectX bug anymore but one in the X11 driver.
I would have sorted the modes by descending refresh frequency so we would always
have choosen the highest one when asking for the default frequency.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-08-05 14:31 -------
Damn. I just have made some inversion. The dup should be bug 2947, not 2081.
But maybe this still sounds quite sane.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.l
| |t
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-08-05 14:26 -------
*** Bug 2081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081
saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From saulius.krasuckas(a)elst.vtu.lt 2005-08-05 14:26 -------
Indeed, it fixes the bug, I've just checked that. Thanks, Lionel. OTOH, is
this (first in the queue) resolution the same like it would be on windows. I
was thinking about writing a test-case. What do you think?
BTW, bug 2947 just duplicates this one, I think. :-P
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2947 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.