http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620
------- Additional Comments From alexander.janssen(a)gmx.de 2003-25-10 12:42 -------
Now that was strange; i disabled the video mode extension. From XF86Config-4(5x):
Option "DisableVidModeExtension" "boolean"
This disables the parts of the VidMode extension used by the
xvidtune client that can be used to change the video modes.
Default: the VidMode extension is enabled.
Not sure if that was the right thing, but i tried anyway and included:
Option "DisableVidModeExtension" "true"
Well, now something weird happened: The first time i started the program in
question (Marble Blast Demo) a window from the program actually appeared
(instead of that wine immediately dropped into the debugger) and complained
about some missing files; allright, that is something which is a problem of the
program and not of wine.
I tried again, then the error appeared again. The program never started again.
Weird, uh? Not reproducable. And dumb me didn't save the debugging information.
Is it worth trying to reproduce that behaviour?
Alex.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620
------- Additional Comments From alexander.janssen(a)gmx.de 2003-25-10 12:28 -------
Yes, my X-Server does indeed support xv extensions, but i don't know, if my wine
is compiled with xv support (Debian unstable package, version 20030618). I
included the "UseXVidMode" statement, without success, same error.
How can i check if my version of wine supports xv? i grepped for xv in wine.bin
and wineserver, without any result. Is there some magic commandline switch like
"--show-compileoptions" or so?
I will disable xv and see if it is working then.
Cheers, Alex.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620
------- Additional Comments From lionel.ulmer(a)free.fr 2003-25-10 12:17 -------
Do you have the XVidMode extensio running on your server
(XFree86-VidModeExtension) and does your Wine build support it ?
Otherwise, try to add this to your config file :
"UseXVidMode" = "Y"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795
dclark(a)akamail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2003-25-10 11:50 -------
Installing an application as root has no affect on the security of the program
when executed, unless the program is installed SUID root, and no Wine programs
are installed SUID. Wine should always be *executed* as a normal user. If you
wish to install Wine as a normal user, that's fine. But this is not a Wine bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620
------- Additional Comments From alexander.janssen(a)gmx.de 2003-25-10 10:46 -------
I just tested if it's a matter of X11 resolution entries. I changed my
XF86Config-4 from
Modes "1152x864" "1024x768"
to
Modes "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
It didn't help. Well, at least it was worth a try.
Cheers, Alex.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620
------- Additional Comments From alexander.janssen(a)gmx.de 2003-25-10 10:40 -------
I can confirm this, i'm running Wine 20030618 on Debian/testing but i don't run
Wine in Desktop mode:
[x11drv]
"AllocSystemColors" = "100"
"PrivateColorMap" = "N"
"PerfectGraphics" = "N"
"Managed" = "Y"
"Desktop" = "N"
"UseDGA" = "Y"
"UseXShm" = "Y"
"DXGrab" = "Y"
"DesktopDoubleBuffered" = "Y"
"TextCP" = "0"
The only thing i can think of is that the program wants to switch to a
video-resolution which i don't have configured im my XF86Config-4.
Will test that later.
Cheers, Alex.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Gave up on that project a year ago. Had to run win4lin.
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 00:56, Wine Bugs wrote:
> http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From bruce.armstrong(a)teamsybase.com 2003-23-10 23:56 -------
> I've asked one of the Sybase engineers to look at it.
>
> Are you still using 6.0, or have you tested this with a later version of PB?
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are a voter for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795
Summary: [wineinstall] requires root user
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-tools
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: jerome.bouat(a)wanadoo.fr
wine version: 20031016
I did not used your "tools/wineinstall" wizard since it required to be "root".
This is strongly not recommanded for an alpa release. Moreover, Windows programs
could then cause some security problems.
I think the installer do not need to require "root" rights. For example, I
created an "install" group on my system. This install group can modify the
"/usr/local" tree. Moreover, I could give rights by hand when "wineinstall" ask
for them.
As a fix, you could simply display a warning such as:
"Use root user for a simplier installation. Although you can install it by
giving the rights wine need by hand when they are required."
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794
Summary: ne does not support Win 3.1 bug
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows 3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: gslink(a)one.net
Windows 3.1 contained a bug which allowed a program to be slightly longer in one aspect than
assigned storage. This was corrected in Win. 95 and many programs would not run there as a
result. The bug was noted by IBM in OS/2 and fixed. This had the same effect as in 95.
Wine does not support this bug. Currently, a good many Win. 3.1 programs will not run
because of this. If a change is made, there must be a switch or other Win. 3.1 programs will
cease to run.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793
Summary: Wine fails to support Windows bugs.
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows 95
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-binary
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: gslink(a)one.net
There was a bug in Win. which caused some programs to print backwards and upside down.
This was fixed by Microsoft but not before many programs were written to generate printing
that was backwards and upside down. The Wine Postscript driver does not support this ability
to handle backwards printing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778
gslink(a)one.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From gslink(a)one.net 2003-24-10 09:49 -------
This bug was fixed in the 10-16-03 distribution.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792
Summary: MaxPayne {1,2} Don't run anymore Under Wine-20031016 and
Wine-CVS_20031024
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: wine-kernel
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: x86zman(a)bigfoot.com
Hello !
I'd like to tell that MaxPayne (both 1 _AND_ 2) Don't run anymore Under
Wine-20031016 and Wine-CVS_200310?? (where '??'' >= '16')...
I'ven't Changed my Wine's config - since 20030911, but still, Max Payne 1 - that
i _Known_ to run well under Wine-20030911 (and also some older versions i've
tested) ceased to work., maybe the Recent split of NTDLL_KERNEL -> NTDLL, KERNEL
broken some things up ?
i did this to try and get an extra info. : wine MaxPayne.exe >& MaxPayne-trace.log
the Log file contained this :
[MaxPayne-trace.log]
err:heap:HEAP_ValidateInUseArena Heap 402d0000: in-use arena 40338668 next block
has PREV_FREE flag
wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0009), starting debugger...
[/MaxPayne-trace.log]
my Box's Hardware :
CPU : AMD Athlon, 1.6GHz (1900+)
RAM : Samsung DDR-SDRAM, 512Mb, 333MHz
HDD : >1.0GB Free on any Partition (200GB Total)
my Box's Software :
OS : Linux 2.4.22 (Sorcerer Linux)
Libs. : GLIBC 2.3.2, BinUtils 2.14, GCC 3.3.2, ALSA,driver 0.9.6, XFree86
4.3.0.1, nVidia,graphics (binary) 4.4.9.6
Please help my Maxy to run again...
Thanks in advance ! :)
Moran
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040
paradoxon101(a)web.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paradoxon101(a)web.de
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791
------- Additional Comments From mb(a)smartftp.com 2003-23-10 12:16 -------
Okay it should say:
"wsprintfW(szOut, L"%ld", 1)"
Actually its irrelevant what the format, and values are. The wsprintf does
never work correctly. Thus I don't think its a bug with wsprintf itself.
I wrote a test case and it worked. But it doesn't with SmartFTP.
-Mat
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791
------- Additional Comments From bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de 2003-23-10 12:09 -------
Could you please write a test for ../dlls/user/wsprintf and submit to
wine-patches? I don't think that "wsprintfW("%ld", 1)" is a valid syntax/
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782
dclark(a)akamail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2003-23-10 11:34 -------
Add wine-bugs to the CC so emails will get into the archives.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791
Summary: wsprintf stack problem
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-user
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: mb(a)smartftp.com
This behavior can only reproduced with the SmartFTP developer build:
http://www.smartftp.com/get/SFTPDev.exe
wsprintfW("%ld", 1) produces something like "14000000" where 14000000 is a
pointer to a variable on the stack. This value is always the same for multiple
wsprintf calls in the same code part.
from the code in wsprintf.c
arg_val(buffer, INT) returns "the" pointer (14000000).
Replacing the wsprintfW function with sprintfW (msvcrt function) solves the
problem. (=> no stack corruption in SmartFTP)
My guess is that for some reason the wsprintf / arg_val function reads the
wrong values from the stack. Stack corruption could only happen within the
wsprintf function.
-Mat
SmartFTP.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347
------- Additional Comments From Martin.vGagern(a)gmx.net 2003-23-10 09:54 -------
What's the status of this bug?
I used winesetuptk, and set UseDGA=N because it looks like there is no DRI
driver for my video card and I thought this might solve it. But I still get a
blank screen. Is there any way I can run the app without geting a black screen,
or would I need a DRI driver for this?
> wine --debugmsg +ddraw,fixme+all 'C:\Program Files\VirtualDub\VirtualDub.exe'
fixme:avifile:AVIFileInit (): stub!
Invalid or unreadable superblock on /dev/floppy/0 (A:). Maybe not FAT?
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
fixme:avifile:AVIFileExit (): stub!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |mike(a)theoretic.com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From mike(a)theoretic.com 2003-23-10 08:39 -------
[assigning to myself]
Jerome - could you try and reproduce the crash in the debugger? For instance:
winedbg winecfg -- --debugmsg +winecfg
then when it crashes, use the "bt" command to get a backtrace, and paste it in
here. thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782
mike(a)theoretic.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike(a)theoretic.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789
bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
------- Additional Comments From bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de 2003-22-10 14:28 -------
It seems the MS msvcrt gives exponents as Exxx(three digits), while glibc
sprintf (which wine msvcrt uses) gives exponents as Exx (two digits)
If applications rely on this behaviour, we have to implement the xsprintf
function family. Volunteers welcome...
I added the todo_wine test for msvcrt
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.