http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14841
Summary: ntdll: file.ok fails in OpenSolaris but not Linux
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Keywords: testcase
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ntdll
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=15384)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15384)
+file in git, bzip2 -9'ed
austin@opensolaris:~/wine-git/dlls/ntdll/tests$ make testclean ; rm -rf ~/.wine
; make file.ok
rm -f atom.ok change.ok env.ok error.ok exception.ok generated.ok info.ok
large_int.ok file.ok om.ok path.ok port.ok reg.ok rtl.ok rtlbitmap.ok rtlstr.ok
string.ok time.ok
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M ntdll.dll -T ../../.. -p ntdll_test.exe.so
file.c && touch file.ok
wine: created the configuration directory '/export/home/austin/.wine'
err:iphlpapi:getNumWithOneHeader Unable to open '/proc/net/route' to count
entries!
err:iphlpapi:getRouteTable unimplemented!
file.c:169: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe
file.c:170: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559
file.c:194: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe
file.c:195: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559
file.c:196: Test failed: read handle is signaled
file.c:284: Test failed: wrong status deadbabe
file.c:285: Test failed: wrong info 3735928559
file.c:286: Test failed: event is signaled
make: *** [file.ok] Error 8
+file attached
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52874
Bug ID: 52874
Summary: win32u change prevents chromium from starting
Product: Wine
Version: 7.7
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: user32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: dark.shadow4(a)web.de
Distribution: ---
The following commit breaks chromium:
commit 0528f37fdd9b11cc95d074bb9e261d5127cb6ec3
Author: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com>
Date: Tue Apr 19 15:34:44 2022 +0200
win32u: Move NtUserFindWindowEx implementation from user32.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>
chromium just prints a few fixmes and then hangs, using one thread fully.
This only affects the sandbox, --no-sandbox is a workaround.
Reverting fixes the issue.
Download for testing (chrome-win.zip):
https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.h…
Please use this version for testing, since it's the newest version not affected
by bug 52845.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51827
Bug ID: 51827
Summary: d3dx10_34:d3dx10 crashes on all versions of Windows
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-d3d-util
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
d3dx10_34:d3dx10 crashes on all versions of Windows:
d3dx10.c:2377: this is the last test seen before the exception
00b8:d3dx10: unhandled exception c0000005 at 000000006C50064B
https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#d3dx10_34:d3dx10
The crash is random but pretty frequent and happens on AMD, NVidia and QEmu
GPUs from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10.
The other d3dx10_*:d3dx10 tests don't crash despite using the same source. So
that means d3dx10_34 is different and the test fails to take that into account.
This test was introduced by the following commit:
commit a15527ff29d919b34ae1f599a5319a4b9678f4e2
Author: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com>
Date: Tue Sep 21 08:52:10 2021 +0300
d3dx10_34/tests: Enable tests.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Matteo Bruni <mbruni(a)codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51783
Bug ID: 51783
Summary: The ieframe:webbrowser output is too big in Wine
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ieframe
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
Distribution: ---
ieframe:webbrowser outputs ~29kB of data. This is too much and contributes in
pushing the WineTest reports above the 1.5MB limit.
The traces break down as follows:
0kB failures
26kB todos
3kB traces
0kB test framework (summary lines, etc.)
Time to fix Wine to reduce the number of todos!
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19183
Summary: "make test" still fails on d3d9/tests/visual.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.25
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-d3d
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
(This is a sequel to bug 10221; perhaps we closed that one too soon.)
Running
i=0
while test $i -lt 10
do
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M d3d9.dll -T ../../.. -p d3d9_test.exe.so
visual.c > visual-$i.log 2>&1
i=`expr $i + 1`
sleep 1
done
cat visual-*.log | grep "Test failed" | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
produces
1 visual.c:9439: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,360 has color 0x00ff00ff,
expected 0x00ff0000
1 visual.c:9441: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,360 has color 0x00ff00ff,
expected 0x0000ff00
1 visual.c:9443: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,120 has color 0x00ff00ff,
expected 0x000000ff
1 visual.c:9445: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,120 has color 0x00ff00ff,
expected 0x00000000
2 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_A32B32G32R32F:
expected no color blending but received it anyway.
3 visual.c:6883: Test failed: SRCALPHA on texture returned color 00000000,
expected 0x00bf4000
3 visual.c:6887: Test failed: DSTALPHA on texture returned color 00000000,
expected 0x000000ff
3 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_G32R32F: expected no
color blending but received it anyway.
3 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_R32F: expected no
color blending but received it anyway.
4 visual.c:8969: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_A16B16G16R16F: Got
color 00000000, expected 0x181800.
4 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_G16R16F: expected no
color blending but received it anyway.
5 visual.c:8326: Test failed: Pixel 14/18 has color 0x00000000, expected
0x0000ff00
5 visual.c:8329: Test failed: Pixel 18/14 has color 0x00000000, expected
0x000000ff
5 visual.c:8332: Test failed: Pixel 18/18 has color 0x00000000, expected
0x0000ffff
5 visual.c:8978: Test failed: Offscreen failed for D3DFMT_R16F: expected no
color blending but received it anyway.
5 visual.c:9439: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 160,360 has color 0x00000000,
expected 0x00ff0000
5 visual.c:9441: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,360 has color 0x00000000,
expected 0x0000ff00
5 visual.c:9443: Test failed: stretchrect: Pixel 480,120 has color 0x00000000,
expected 0x000000ff
7 visual.c:8800: Test failed: Texture 1(output color 1) has color 0x00000000,
expected 0x0000ff00
7 visual.c:8802: Test failed: Texture 2(output color 2) has color 0x00000000,
expected 0x000000ff
lspci | grep -i vga says
00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 7100/nForce 630i
(rev a2)
and this is on Jaunty x86-64 with the proprietary nvidia 180 driver.
I'll attach the output of glxinfo.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53015
Bug ID: 53015
Summary: winscp bookmark adding error
Product: Wine
Version: 6.0
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: gonghuiii(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 72382
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=72382
error message and then exit
When using WinSCP to add a bookmark, it gives me errors when adding without
checking the 'add to shared bookmark' option.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52821
Bug ID: 52821
Summary: Missing support of C++20 Semaphores in built-in Wine
C++ runtime
Product: Wine
Version: 7.6
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: msvcp
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: kle(a)bluewin.ch
Distribution: ---
Hi all
Right at the beginning it should be noted that the following error may have
been already described.
There seems to exist currently no support of C++20 Semaphores in Wines built-in
C++ library. I noticed this limitation with two applications. The following
"msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll" related error message is shown when this issue
occurs. Both apps crash right after.
CXBX-R Xbox emulator (starting with build 374ba5e):
wine: Call from 7B011586 to unimplemented function
msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.__std_atomic_wait_direct, aborting
wine: Call from 7B011586 to unimplemented function
msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.__std_atomic_notify_one_direct, aborting
PCSX-Redux PSX emulator (all newer builds since 4317):
wine: Call from 0000000000272B9E to unimplemented function
msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.__std_atomic_wait_direct, aborting
wine: Unimplemented function msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.__std_atomic_wait_direct
called at address 0000000000272B9E (thread 010c), starting debugger...
wine: Call from 0000000000272B9E to unimplemented function
msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll.__std_atomic_notify_one_direct, aborting
Both applications worked before the "std::binary_semaphore" C++20 type was
introduced.
It is confirmed for Wine 7.0 that it can handle this situation when vcrun2019
(native MS Visual C++ 2019) is installed via winetricks. But for whatever
reason this stopped to work in later Wine 7.x devel versions.
A further workaround was to put a native "msvcp140_atomic_wait.dll" into the
program folder. I can confirm that this helped at least for a while in
conjunction with the PCSX-Redux emulator. But also here this tweak stopped to
work in later Wine 7.x devel versions.
More information can be found at the CXBX-R GitHub issue page:
https://github.com/Cxbx-Reloaded/Cxbx-Reloaded/issues/2347
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
Bug ID: 51680
Summary: nsi:nsi test_ip_neighbour() fails on unreachable link
local entry
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com
nsi:nsi has a failure on cw-rx460 from Windows 1709 to 21H1:
nsi.c:680: Test failed: AF_INET: 0 vs 1
https://test.winehq.org/data/patterns.html#nsi:nsi
The failing test has been introduced by the commit below and failed from the
start:
commit c09c65f65c188a1870d279ca793c5ad1fc15440d
Author: Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com>
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 10 09:20:47 2021 +0100
nsiproxy: Implement IPv4 neighbour enumerate_all.
Signed-off-by: Huw Davies <huw(a)codeweavers.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>
Adding some traces shows that the failure happens on a link local entry:
AF_INET: 5 InterfaceIndex=10 state=0/0 s_addr=169.254.169.254
I have not identified the corresponding network interface. Also, given that
cw-rx460 ad cw-gtx560 are very similar I would expect both to have this issue
and I don't know why that's not the case.
However what is interesting is that in both cases the state is NlnsUnreachable
so I suspect the is_unreachable / IsUnreachable flags are not necessarily
meaningful.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.