http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10273
Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefandoesinger@gmx.at
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at 2007-11-01 19:34:45 --- I don't know if this is related, but Ivan Leo talked about some hook testing done by safedisk 2. Appart of other things, it checks if all CALLs have a RET. It started at the exported functions, but eventually dived into Linux libraries. GCC generated code which broke these checks, e.g.
... xxx: pop eax; jmp eax; ... call xxx ...
To find the address of the code in memory or somesuch.
Could this be the statistical heuristic you see?