http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27894
Jason Edmeades us@edmeades.me.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |us@edmeades.me.uk
--- Comment #3 from Jason Edmeades us@edmeades.me.uk 2012-09-02 17:51:50 CDT --- 2 issues here...
1. for /L doesnt respect boundaries and often falls one short when using 'normal' numbers (should be <= and >= rather than > and <)
2. When no iterations occur, the rest of the for loop (the bit in brackets OR the do xxxxx part) is left as the next command, so it steps on to try to execute it
Patches submitted for both parts: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2012-September/117422.html http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2012-September/117421.html