[Bug 57061] SRWLock is slower than CriticalSection on wine. Why?

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061

--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur  ---
Created attachment 76932
  --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=76932
Another benchmark with leb128 instead of text

https://github.com/cppfastio/fast_io/blob/next/benchmark/0002.file_io_tsc/ti...

windows:
iobuf_file_lockable_leb128_critical_section.exe
output:0.1355566s
input:0.1343125s

iobuf_file_lockable_leb128_srwlock.exe
output:0.1290951s
input:0.1271444s

wine:
$ wine ./iobuf_file_lockable_leb128_critical_section.exe
output:0.1806937s
input:0.1704513s
$ wine ./iobuf_file_lockable_leb128_srwlock.exe
output:0.3658482s
input:0.3381468s

Same binary. SRWLock is nearly 2x slower.