http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17624
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2009-03-05 17:00:00 --- (In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
I know I could install gecko in /usr/local/share/wine,
That's what you should do.
but I've got my reasons for not doing so, and I'm sure others may have similar reasons against it.
It's the only supported way to install Wine Gecko. I don't see any reason to not use it.
There's not a simple way then to test an application _without_ using gecko if it's installed that way. Or am I wrong on that?
You're right (unless you're using native mshtml.dll), but I don't see any reason to test that.
Sometimes it's helpful to test for some applications that only use gecko for minor features. Guess I'll just bite the bullet and install it globally...