http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22580
--- Comment #48 from joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se 2010-05-15 09:11:20 --- (In reply to comment #47)
(In reply to comment #46)
I am way past that. I have already identified the problem and provided a fix. There is also a test report that Windows < Vista behaves as my patch does.
Juan is not talking about the problem stemming from native (that is, Windows's implementation) crypt32's behavior, but rather whatever problems that come from using builtin (that is, Wine's implementation) crypt32. Most likely the motivation for using native comes from defects in Wine, so identifying those would be helpful.
That seems like a waste of time, such things has been tired before, see http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13687 for instance.
The main problem remains the same: tmo=0 isn't handled by Wine like Windows < Vista does. Any app that relies on the old convention will experience the 100% CPU or similar. If you really want to help, you should try my patch on all those 100% CPU bugs in bugzilla and see if that helps.