https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52492
--- Comment #8 from David Kahurani k.kahurani@gmail.com --- (In reply to Fabian Maurer from comment #7)
I don't know how correct it is but, personally, to re-write this function, I'd try to construct it into a quadratic loop.
for(initial;constraint;advance){ for (initial;constraint;advance) {
} }
Not sure how exactly you mean.
I realized that the solution I had in my mind would be performance intensive. Probably so very much so that it would not be viable. So, well, never mind I said that.