http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12302
Daniel Santos daniel.santos@pobox.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #14856|0 |1 is obsolete| |
--- Comment #75 from Daniel Santos daniel.santos@pobox.com 2008-07-17 14:07:59 --- Created an attachment (id=14876) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14876) Modified WSASendTo() to clear last error upon success, as seems to be the windows behavior.
(In reply to comment #74)
There's no reason to argue here. Simply add a conformance test to the patch that proves how Windows behaves. Should be about fifteen lines of code tops.
Sure, there's a reason, it's fun and you get a lot of exercise jumping to conclusions, flying off the handle, running around in circles and climbing all over each others' backs! Besides, it took me more than 15 lines of code to write the tests -- this gives me something else to argue about, w00t!! On top of THAT, I had to spend a few hours reading up on how wine conformance tests are done, analyzing it to make sure I understand it's reasons and that it uses a good design, followed by concluding that it doesn't in my usual pompous fashion. :)
Please let me know what else I screwed up and I'll fix it. :) Thanks!