http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17084
--- Comment #6 from Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com 2009-10-11 21:08:26 --- (In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Don't you mind to resend these or patches were rejected for some still valid reason?
I don't recall whether I got official commentary, but I can think of a good reason the first patch was rejected: the tested executable was the output of GCC.
OMG, didn't look at test..nice table
That was laziness on my part, as I ought to have generated my own tiny executable, perhaps by hand, like dlls/kernel32/tests/loader.c does. I just never got one working, and I haven't had time to work on it lately. Help with good tests would be appreciated ;-)
I know nothing about such low level stuff to be honest, but it's mood problem, you know. So may be.