http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18070
--- Comment #55 from Nicklas Börjesson nicklas@ws.se 2009-08-09 14:08:03 --- (In reply to comment #54)
Hello,
there is no need to provide test data. The problem is well known and a short-term hack-patch exists which was consequently rejected by AJ.
I was not aware of this. I was just trying to help out to show how it was on the latest version.
Until someone takes up the task to implement "remote" custom actions (custom action server) you'll have to use the hack-patch.
Ok, that's a letdown.
Unfortunately this whole bug is now messed up with many useless/irritating comments that have nothing to do with the original bug.
I am sorry if I have irritated you, it was a mistake, I thought the comment on the attachment was going to end up under the attachment details, an not on the bug, I had forgot how that worked. Please feel free to delete all comments you feel are redundant(like this one and the preceeding short discussion).