https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48324
--- Comment #9 from Roman Pišl rpisl@seznam.cz --- I understand and it sounds reasonable, but.. according to the standard: if a double-precision number is converted to a decimal string with at least 17 significant digits, and then converted back to double-precision representation, the final result must match the original number. This is violated in current implementation.