[Bug 8514] getsockname

[Wine Bugs]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8514

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2007-09-06 05:37 -------
I realised that I was reading that file from bottom to top while taking a 
shower an hour after the post :) I looked at the code again and thers this few 
lines above

if ( i == 0 ) {
            peer[i].addr.sin_port       = htons ( SERVERPORT );
        } else {
            peer[i].addr.sin_port       = htons ( 0 );
        }

so the author of this testcase wrote 
        ok ( peer[i].addr.sin_port != htons ( 0 ), "UDP: bind() did not 
associate port\n" );
thinking that 
a/ using sin_port returned by getsockname to check if we get the port bind is a 
good idea
b/ it can happen with no SOCKET_ERROR