[Bug 57061] New: SRWLock is slower than CriticalSection on wine. Why?

[WineHQ Bugzilla]

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57061

Bug ID: 57061
           Summary: SRWLock is slower than CriticalSection on wine. Why?
           Product: Wine
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: x86-64
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ntdll
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
      Distribution: ---

https://github.com/cppfastio/fast_io/blob/next/benchmark/0002.file_io_tsc/ti...

[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH time]$ wine
./iobuf_file_lockable_critical_section.exe 
output:0.3784567s
input:0.1407622s
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH time]$ rm *.txt
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH time]$ wine ./iobuf_file_lockable_srwlock.exe 
output:0.5857926s
input:0.3284965s
[cqwrteur@DESKTOP-9B705LH time]$ rm *.txt

This is very strange tbh. Because on windows SRWLock is faster than
CriticalSection. I have checked wine's implementation and I don't see why
SRWLock is slower than CriticalSection on wine either since the implementation
is very simple.