https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55290
François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS|Linux |Windows
--- Comment #3 from François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com --- And this also happened 4 times on my desktop but with a smaller than expected height this time. As a result more tests failed:
videorenderer.c:1957: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1963: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1968: Test failed: Got window bottom 412. videorenderer.c:1984: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1990: Test failed: Got height 412. videorenderer.c:1995: Test failed: Got window bottom 412. [...] videorenderer.c:2614: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2620: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2626: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2632: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2638: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2648: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2654: Test failed: Got height 378. videorenderer.c:2690: Test failed: Got height 378.
This may be explained by a previous test that changes the screen resolution and fails to restore it. But could that also explain the cases where we get a bigger width / height than the expected 640x480?