http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24549
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2010-10-19 07:32:55 CDT --- (In reply to comment #8)
I looked at the fn and it doesn't look difficult to ensure there is no below-%esp accesses. Is there some reason why the function has this particular below-%esp accesses, or is it just an accident of history?
Mostly for efficiency reasons, though at this point the function can probably be simplified a bit by not restoring all the segment regs.