https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #15 from joaopa jeremielapuree@yahoo.fr --- Thats not the way of working of wine.
If a patch introduces a regression, then the patch needs to be improved with a new patch. Not reverting and losing the thing it fixed.
That's the general way. Obviously, if the patch breaks tons of features, it will be reverted, waiting for a better solution (sometimes it happens)
But it is not the case of the patch of this bug report.