http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12706
William Pettersson william.pettersson@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |william.pettersson@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from William Pettersson william.pettersson@gmail.com 2009-04-18 23:25:47 --- The patch won't change my situation, nor some other commenters. I have a Logitech Desktop USB Microphone, comes up as an AK5370. It has one single control, for the Microphone. It has no playback support at all. # amixer -c 0 scontrols Simple mixer control 'Mic',0
Reading the comments in mixer.c, it seems a Master control is "wanted" by the Windows API. I'm not sure on the exact meaning of "wanted" in this context, whether the API will be broken if a Master control is not provided for a capture-only device.
I'm quite happy to hack through the source code to work on this, but should the aim be to provide a "dummy" Master control that does nothing, or should a device with no Master control be provided?