http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15419
--- Comment #20 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-12-19 12:03:52 --- (In reply to comment #12)
It's a different conception of treating our users. Do we force them to be beta testers for the "greater good", knowing that most won't bother learning to use bugzilla and fill bug reports, or do we consider them as users and rely on the ones that would have volunteered to be tester anyway?
If they're bothering to use AppDB, they're already in the minority of wine users, and bugzilla is not that much more of a step.
I'm not saying we shouldn't have 1.0.1 in the list, but it's not that _big_ of a priority. Fixing bugs in newer wine releases is, which is why you won't find many people here worried about it.
The source is there if someone wants to patch it to always include 1.0.1.
That's oh so nice. However, whoever's going to learn how to do that might as well learn C, fix all the remaining bugs in wine and be done with.
PHP is easier than C to pick up. This is an open source project, not a paid for one. You can't expect someone to fix every whim you have, when you have just as much capability as the next person.
If you or anyone else adds it, it'd be helpful to differentiate 1.0.1 as stable and the rest as unstable.