http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33318
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Dösinger stefan@codeweavers.com 2013-04-04 01:17:18 CDT --- I have 3 systems performing automated performance tracking on a Radeon X1600 (r300g), Radeon HD 5770 (r600g) and Geforce 7600 (nvidia binary). Data is available here:
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1304031-STEF-WINE15222&track_view=400 (r300g) http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1304037-STEF-WINE15299&track_view=400 (r600g) http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1304031-FO-WINE1524915&track_view=400 (nvidia, new) http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1302087-FO-WINE1523835&track_view=400
You have to read the results right to left, and the graphs are a bit of a mess. r300g spotted a small performance drop in 3DMark2k1 around Wine 1.4. r600g was switched from fglrx to r600g at some point, screwing up performance comparisons. Furthermore the r600g results are unreadable because the website is confused - download the raw XML and put it into Libreoffice or gnuplot or something. The nvidia box was upgraded from some ancient ubuntu to a modern arch a few test revisions back, which broke the link between the old and new results and caused a ~5% performance drop. Unfortunately the old results are unreadable as well because of one misguided test result :-( . I really have to nag Michael Larabel about that...