http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14983
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-09-04 08:40:28 --- (In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Here is the bisect result : $ git bisect good 21cdaeea4bfa05859bb89dd27e3477e0cb07bb92 is first bad commit commit 21cdaeea4bfa05859bb89dd27e3477e0cb07bb92 Author: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com Date: Thu Aug 21 15:02:15 2008 +0900 gdi32: Replace DC transform by font scaling for bitmap fonts. :040000 040000 be66e6aed5e6e12d23a186f6451fd630462a8561 fb912db74c97c49b16aa9dd7b247ffd629b2710e Mdlls
That patch has been committed before 1.1.2, so I don't see how 1.1.3 can be worse than 1.1.2.
The date of your commitment:
Author: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com Date: Thu Aug 21 15:02:15 2008 +0900 gdi32: Replace DC transform by font scaling for bitmap fonts.
points at 1 day before releasing Wine 1.1.3 and surely after Wine 1.1.2 so it is in par with my bisecting results, I think. I did this testing again with the same result. Am I right ?
You are right, my bad, I confused that patch with another one which actually introduced separate world transforms for glyph outlines. But what my patch above does is basically do the things an old way - how it was done before 1.1.0. Could you test with 1.0.9 and 1.1.0 and report the results?