http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Summary: Wise Registry Cleaner: Error message at startup Product: Wine Version: 1.3.27 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=36217) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36217) Error message
Steps to reproduce: 1) remove ~/.wine 2) install Wise Registry Cleaner 3) wine WiseRegCleaner.exe
Behaviour: Error message (See attachment).
Expected behaviour: No error message.
Terminal output: fixme:resource:GetGuiResources (0xd4,0): stub
Additional info: Access violation at address 00456D49 in module 'WiseRegCleaner.exe'. Read of address 000006BD.
Workaround: WINEDEBUG=+relay
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
NSLW lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download URL| |http://www.wisecleaner.com/ | |soft/WRCFree.exe
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
--- Comment #1 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com 2011-09-03 19:42:18 CDT --- Created an attachment (id=36220) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36220) working screenshot
Tested in latest git (wine-1.3.27-224-g32c36b7) and can't see the error. I installed the application in a clean prefix, started it and did a scan (there are small visual glitches related maybe to transparency).
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
--- Comment #2 from NSLW lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com 2011-09-04 01:49:20 CDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=36220)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=36220) [details]
working screenshot
Tested in latest git (wine-1.3.27-224-g32c36b7) and can't see the error. I installed the application in a clean prefix, started it and did a scan (there are small visual glitches related maybe to transparency).
I still have got error unless i use WINEDEBUG=+relay. I compile wine myself on Fedora 15 32 bit with gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110603 (Red Hat 4.6.0-10). Wine version I tested is wine-1.3.27-177-gff0cea3
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
GyB gyebro69@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gyebro69@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from GyB gyebro69@gmail.com 2011-09-04 02:02:48 CDT --- (In reply to comment #2)
I still have got error unless i use WINEDEBUG=+relay. I compile wine myself on Fedora 15 32 bit with gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110603 (Red Hat 4.6.0-10). Wine version I tested is wine-1.3.27-177-gff0cea3
I suppose you compiled Wine with the default optimization flags (e.g. -O2), right? I can reproduce the crash in the application here on Fedora 15 when using -O2. The application starts correctly when -O0 is used.
Fedora 15 x86 gcc version 4.6.0 20110603 (Red Hat 4.6.0-10) (GCC) wine-1.3.27-224-g32c36b7
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
--- Comment #4 from NSLW lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com 2011-09-04 02:07:20 CDT ---
I suppose you compiled Wine with the default optimization flags (e.g. -O2), right? I can reproduce the crash in the application here on Fedora 15 when using -O2. The application starts correctly when -O0 is used.
I compiled using following statement. FLAGS="-g -gdwarf-2 -O0" ./configure --disable-tests && make -j3
If you think it's unimportant compilation issue, you can close this bug.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
--- Comment #5 from GyB gyebro69@gmail.com 2011-09-04 02:21:06 CDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
FLAGS="-g -gdwarf-2 -O0" ./configure --disable-tests && make -j3
If you think it's unimportant compilation issue, you can close this bug.
Is that only a typo here or you indeed compiled the source by passing FLAGS (instead of CFLAGS) to the configure script? In the later case FLAGS was ignored and actually -O2 was used during compilation. You can verify that by inspecting the beginning of the generated Makefile: CFLAGS=....
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
NSLW lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from NSLW lukasz.wojnilowicz@gmail.com 2011-09-04 02:28:23 CDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
Is that only a typo here or you indeed compiled the source by passing FLAGS (instead of CFLAGS) to the configure script? In the later case FLAGS was ignored and actually -O2 was used during compilation. You can verify that by inspecting the beginning of the generated Makefile: CFLAGS=....
That wasn't typo so i guess this bug is duplicate of #22925. Thanks for helping me with this parameter :)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22925 ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE |
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com 2011-09-04 03:02:02 CDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Is that only a typo here or you indeed compiled the source by passing FLAGS (instead of CFLAGS) to the configure script? In the later case FLAGS was ignored and actually -O2 was used during compilation. You can verify that by inspecting the beginning of the generated Makefile: CFLAGS=....
That wasn't typo so i guess this bug is duplicate of #22925. Thanks for helping me with this parameter :)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 22925 ***
What makes you think this bug is related to bug 22925? It's likely that playing with the optimization level is masking a memory corruption issue, rather than showing that the two bugs have the same causative issue. For that matter, the problem in bug 22925 has not been identified.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |frederic.delanoy@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com 2011-09-17 14:00:51 CDT --- Can't confirm in 1.3.28 (wine compiled with -O0 -g)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com 2011-10-21 14:27:29 CDT --- The same underlying problem in the Wise Registry Cleaner is covered in bug 28753, making this bug a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 28753 ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Nguyen arethusa26@gmail.com 2011-10-21 14:27:44 CDT --- Closing the bug.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28266
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.wisecleaner.com/ |https://web.archive.org/web |soft/WRCFree.exe |/20110909130542/http://www. | |wisecleaner.com/soft/WRCFre | |e.exe CC| |focht@gmx.net Component|-unknown |build-env Severity|minor |normal