http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Summary: Regression since 0.9.47 until 0.9.51: software crashes upon start Product: Wine Version: 0.9.51. Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-dbghelp AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: versaille@numericable.fr
Created an attachment (id=9633) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=9633) Backtrace
An old sofware that worked fine for a long time does not work at all since wine 0.9.47. I tried every version until 0.9.51. It crashes when I start it. So I keep reinstallilng and using wine 0.9.46 after I try each new version of wine. I use Debian Etch/Testing/Unstable.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at 2007-12-15 06:53:30 --- *Please* name *at least* the name of the software that has the problem. Otherwise the bugreport is completely useless
Also, please consider running a regression test: http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #2 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 07:07:39 --- The software's name is absolutely irrelevant and useless anyway, it is a very old French dictionary that probably noone here ever heard of. It is called Le Grand Robert, but I could name it gzgh71 or dvt244bd3: it won't help anyone to solve that bug unless bug solving now involves voodoo incantations. I will do the regression testing today or tomorrow if you swear on my life that the backtrace is useless. Thank you Stefan!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at 2007-12-15 07:26:46 --- The software's name allows us to test this ourselves, if it is still available. If the software isn't available any more, you're pretty much on your own.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #4 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 07:58:28 --- So it means the backtrace and regression testing are absolutely useless?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at 2007-12-15 08:24:59 --- Regression testing definitly isn't useless. The backtrace doesn't help much without regression testing though. But remote debugging is a terrible task, and most people prefer to have the app themselves.
(The backtrace looks 16 bit related, and I have no idea about that, so I won't be able to help you personally)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank@kegel.com
--- Comment #6 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2007-12-15 08:52:47 --- I downloaded a demo of the current version (2.0), and will file bugs for that, but it's probably much newer than the one you have (yours was partly 16 bits) and has different bugs.
He's not saying regression testing is useless; he's saying you need to do it yourself, as we can't help if we can't get a copy of the app, and it's awful hard for us to do that if we don't even know what it's called. So go ahead and do the regression test by building from source and using 'git bisect' to find the patch that broke things. If you can find a copy we can try, so much the better.
(There seems to be one or two for sale on ebay.fr; are any of those the same version you have?)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-dbghelp |wine-misc Keywords| |regression Summary|Regression since 0.9.47 |old version of Le Grand |until 0.9.51: software |Robert crashes at startup |crashes upon start | Version|0.9.51. |0.9.47.
--- Comment #7 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2007-12-15 09:01:49 --- Added 'regression' keyword, fixed original reported version to first version that failed, made summary shorter and more descriptive.
(The 32 bit version has a demo at http://lerobert.customers.artful.net/editions-electroniques/catalogue/gr/gra... but I still haven't found the demo of the 16 bit version.)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-misc |wine-dbghelp Version|0.9.47. |0.9.51.
--- Comment #8 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 09:20:56 --- Thank you all for your comments! Dan, those on sale on ebay.fr are recent 32-bits versions. I will do the regression testing today or tomorrow.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-dbghelp |wine-misc Version|0.9.51. |0.9.47.
--- Comment #9 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2007-12-15 10:55:35 --- Please don't change version and component. Knowing initial version where the problem started is more interesting.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-misc |wine-dbghelp Version|0.9.47. |0.9.51.
--- Comment #10 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 11:02:28 --- I am in the middle of the regression testing now, with versions 0.9.46 and .47. Is it OK?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-dbghelp |wine-misc Version|0.9.51. |0.9.47.
--- Comment #11 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2007-12-15 11:06:49 --- Pay attentions to what bugzilla tells you when you hit that submit button.
DO NOT CHANGE THE VERSION AND COMPONENT!!!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|wine-misc |wine-dbghelp Version|0.9.47. |0.9.51.
--- Comment #12 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 11:31:07 --- I am testing the versions just before and just after the regression, as instructed by the regression testing page. As for the component, I checked that component since it is the first word I saw appear in the backtrace, but I do not know how relevant it is. So I am doing the bisecting on wine as a whole, not on any specific component. Now I am at: Bisecting: 19 revisions left to test after this
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal Component|wine-dbghelp |wine-misc Version|0.9.51. |0.9.47.
--- Comment #13 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2007-12-15 13:14:28 --- (In reply to comment #12)
I am testing the versions just before and just after the regression, as instructed by the regression testing page. As for the component, I checked that component since it is the first word I saw appear in the backtrace, but I do not know how relevant it is. So I am doing
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THEN WHY DO YOU CHANGE IT??????
Again I'm asking you DO NOT CHANGE THESE FIELD! Or this bug will be closed as invalid.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #14 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 13:32:18 --- Are you mentally-ill? Anyway, someone changed the component from dbg to misc, so what the fuss?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #15 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 14:39:42 --- I reached this point: Bisecting: 1 revisions left to test after this [263cb44d7640dead60b9c989cded7b134f2f38d5] setupapi: Use correct parameter in pointer init. The change was made in 0.9.47
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #16 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-15 14:49:29 --- Sorry! I finished a final compilation (which I believed would be unnecessary), and here is the final result (and it fits perfectly since my software is 16-bit!): 6e9fea22f82fe60624e1081d74ad990a5c428eed is first bad commit commit 6e9fea22f82fe60624e1081d74ad990a5c428eed Author: Rémi Assailly remi.assailly@free.fr Date: Tue Oct 2 20:13:09 2007 +0200
user32: Moved some 16-bit functions.
:040000 040000 c9942d4de82213c13f9ba48439acf3a26aa4cb18 fcc11fcd6cb0d73f7ecca203083f25a386d4fb28 M dlls
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2007-12-17 06:43:07 --- You are right, that patch is broken. I've reverted it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
--- Comment #18 from WhinyWiner versaille@numericable.fr 2007-12-17 06:58:01 --- Great! Merci Alexandre!
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10775
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #19 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2008-01-28 05:41:02 --- Closing all RESOLVED FIXED bugs older than four weeks.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org