https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419
Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Fix the 'Failure running script in VM' errors Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: fgouget@codeweavers.com Distribution: ---
There are two very common 'boterror' types:
Failure running script in VM: the "nc -q0 '10.42.42.133' '4242'" command returned 1 and Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9)
Both seem to correspond to a network issue and both seem to almost exclusively and systematically happen with the w864 and w1064 VMs when running either a 32 or 64 bit WineTest job (i.e. running the full suite).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419
François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com --- It seems that nowadays this only happens when a Windows VM crashes. In such a case it is normal for the connection to break down.
Also such errors are better handled. The TestBot will actually rerun the test to rule out a temporary network issue. It will also check whether the VM is still powered on or not. And in cases where it is sure the test is not the culprit (e.g. if the issue happens when sending the test binary), the task is requeued and no error is reported on that test.
There may be cases where a runaway Windows Update caused Windows to reboot at an importune time (see also bug 47800). These would highly depend on how long ago the VM was booted. Normally Windows Update is always disabled... except on Windows 10 where this is not reliable. So if there are cases where Windows Update is causing trouble a bug should be filed against the specific VM.
So I think this issue is essentially solved.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39419
François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from François Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com --- Closing.