New subject: [Bug 25950] SEE_MASK_NO_CONSOLE flag in ShellExecuteEx have opposite effect

1 Feb 2011


      http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25950
Summary: SEE_MASK_NO_CONSOLE flag in ShellExecuteEx have
                    opposite effect
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.3.12
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: shell32
        AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org
        ReportedBy: atohom@gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=33084)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=33084)
compiled executable
Despite of what MSDN is saying SEE_MASK_NO_CONSOLE in not equivalent of
CREATE_NEW_CONSOLE from CreateProcess, it its opposite.
On Windows this test program runs in single window, but in wine it creates
separate console.
#include <windows.h>
int main(int nargs,char *args[])
{
  SHELLEXECUTEINFOW si={sizeof(si)};
si.fMask=SEE_MASK_FLAG_NO_UI|SEE_MASK_NOASYNC|SEE_MASK_NOCLOSEPROCESS|SEE_MASK_NO_CONSOLE;
  si.lpFile=L"cmd.exe";
  si.lpParameters=L"/C dir && pause";
  si.nShow = SW_SHOWNORMAL;
  ShellExecuteExW(&si);
  WaitForSingleObject(si.hProcess, INFINITE);
  return 0;
}
-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 25950] New: SEE_MASK_NO_CONSOLE flag in ShellExecuteEx have opposite effect