http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Summary: URU: path of the shell no longer alows window managment. Product: Wine Version: 1.1.36 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: spammaster@madtracker.net
When starting URU path of the shell. The application window dissapears. The process keeps running as I can hear the sound and music still playing.
This bug only occurs when I select both options: let window manager decode the window and let window manager control the window.
If I select one of both the game still runs fine. Only with both options selected, the crash occurs.
This is tested on a clean wineprefix and the bug has occured at wineversion 1.1.36 Everything runs great on version 1.1.35
Running on Nvidia driver 190.53
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
spammaster@madtracker.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|URU: path of the shell no |URU: path of the shell no |longer alows window |longer allows window |managment. |managment.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |regression
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2010-01-08 18:41:51 --- Please post the results of your regression test http://wiki.winehq.org/RegressionTesting
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #2 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-09 18:45:33 --- Created an attachment (id=25633) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=25633) regressiontestresults
I have done the regressiontest and put the result into the attachment. This is a big first time for me so it may be wrong. I have followed each step and it looks right and the app runs correctly so I presume I have done this right.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |madewokherd@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-01-09 21:06:21 --- No need to attach it: Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [0c9991c583a0694502121eefb2c91289a6719dc9] gdiplus: Implement GdipSetImageAttributesColorMatrix. dimitri@AMD64LNX2:~/wine-git$ git bisect bad 0c9991c583a0694502121eefb2c91289a6719dc9 is first bad commit commit 0c9991c583a0694502121eefb2c91289a6719dc9 Author: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com Date: Fri Dec 18 17:42:18 2009 -0600
gdiplus: Implement GdipSetImageAttributesColorMatrix.
:040000 040000 b4b3e7d971d5f9e9e9fa55432f2094b7096ac7dd c083440e15b579a9508e2d3c7cd1065424302641 M dlls
Does reverting that commit help? Please attach a +gdiplus trace. 'winetricks gdiplus' should work around it..
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #4 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-10 10:31:56 --- Its going bizar on me. The results keep changing. If I restart the app like ten times it sometimes go. I fear that I may have found the wrong cause. I have performed the regression test like a 50 times by now and I keep getting different results. For each test I have build a brand new wine prefix. No matter what I do it sometimes go and it sometimes doesn't
The gdiplus override doesn't give any results. Just to be sure that something else didn't change I have tested the two different wine versions on different machines and the same happens on any machine or distro in wine-1.1.36.
Am I doing something wrong here?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #5 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-10 13:20:17 --- Please bare with me and forgive me. I am a total noob at this. You have to recompile wine after every regression test. I am doing the regression test all over again and I hope Ill do it right this time. I am so sorry.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #6 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-10 14:56:07 --- 00b06dac85c096f20f7beed8898553166f07e6ad is first bad commit commit 00b06dac85c096f20f7beed8898553166f07e6ad Author: Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org Date: Mon Jan 4 17:56:32 2010 +0100
winex11: Don't process ConfigureNotify events that have been superseded by a later configure request.
:040000 040000 956437108a6638a74c1f2ea2698d68cb85ba3536 ebc929b6f959cd1874653d9a6d4fb63f0b3add0c M dlls
Ok this should be the right one. Should the app run when I make this one or not? and otherwise: how can I take the bisect one step back to make sure that this is the one we are looking for??
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Povirk madewokherd@gmail.com 2010-01-10 15:02:19 --- I think you've probably got it right this time. That change is relevant to window management.
To go to that revision, run: $ git checkout 00b06dac8
To go to the revision before that, add a caret: $ git checkout 00b06dac8^
If the test was correct, that revision will be broken but the one before will not.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #8 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-10 15:07:52 --- Confirmed. I got the right one. skipping one back makes the app run like a charm.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-01-11 10:54:08 --- What window manager are you using?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #10 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-11 11:18:09 --- kwin. Part of the KDE desktop.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #11 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-14 18:05:26 --- Forgot to mention the version. Here is the console output from kwin -v
Qt: 4.5.2 KDE: 4.3.2 (KDE 4.3.2) KWin: 4.3.2 (KDE 4.3.2)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #12 from spammaster@madtracker.net 2010-01-22 12:49:35 --- Still present in wine 1.1.37
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #13 from Matthew Thompson matt.t.911@gmail.com 2010-06-07 05:08:25 --- Created an attachment (id=28646) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28646) Example screenshot of EVE-Online graphical bug
As you can see in this screenshot, the scan probe spheres are appearing far too bright and making it difficult to scan correctly in the game.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Matthew Thompson matt.t.911@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt.t.911@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Matthew Thompson matt.t.911@gmail.com 2010-06-07 05:09:55 --- Please disregard my additions to this bug, it appears that my browser glitched and redirected me to the wrong bug.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regression SHA1| |00b06dac85c096f20f7beed8898 | |553166f07e6ad
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
--- Comment #15 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2013-11-13 16:49:38 CST --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for 2 years. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.6 or newer) wine? If so, please attach the terminal output in 1.7.6 (see http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |ABANDONED
--- Comment #16 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Abandoned.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21290
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #17 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org