http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8051
Abraham stormbolter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stormbolter@gmail.com
--- Comment #109 from Abraham stormbolter@gmail.com 2011-04-26 06:57:47 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #108)
(In reply to comment #107)
Last I checked, Wine hardcodes the constant instead of actually checking the
hardware.
Where would that be? Wined3d reads the constants from the opengl library. It
subtracts a number of constants from the available ones on certain drivers(e.g.
fglrx and OSX) where we know that the driver needs some for its own purposes.
This doesn't change the number of constants that is advertised to the d3d app
though. The driver reserved constants are there to avoid GLSL compile errors
with shaders that use indirect addressing(and thus potentially use all
available constants)
We do limit the hardware shader constants to 256 in d3d9 and d3d8 because there
are some games that break if more constants are supported.
d3d9:Set*ShaderConstantF rejects constants >= 256 as well. This seems incorrect
with software vertex processing and we should probably change the check a bit.
(e.g. check against the HW capabilities, and if hardware VP is used cap the
constants at 256, otherwise 8192)
But what I've never understood about this bug is, lots of bugs are
filed that prevent an application or game from starting, and they might be the
only affected app/game, but people pay attention and usually attempt to fix the
problem. This bug for some reason has been demoted its entire life as
unimportant.
There are three things in play here: (a) the effort needed for a proper fix,
(b) the limited effect on other games(we'd probably just fix a single game) and
(c) that implementing a proper fix requires a lot of knowledge how wined3d
works.
(a)+(b) prevent the main wined3d developers from working on this bug, (c) makes
it unlikely that a new volunteer shows up and writes a patch.
I think (B) is not very relevant. There are a lot of fixes made to run a single
piece of software (ex: WOW or Microsoft Word), that probably affects only the
single app or just a simple subset.
I know I'm just voicing my frustration here. There is little save putting a
small reward that I can do to help this bug fix, but is the single bug that
refrains me from migrating my girlfriend's computer to ubuntu, as she is a very
avid sims 2 gamer (and doesn't like sims 3 -too many micropayments, and too
much money invested on previous game-). I can replace office, and teach her to
use shotwell to manage her photo collection, but if she has to reboot to play
the sims 2, is no use.
Many sims 2 players are like my girlfriend, avid fans, but no tech skills (I'm
no programmer myself).
A suggestion... There's any mechanism for offering bounties for bugfixing?
Maybe, while we cannot offer tech expertise, we can offer a monetary
compensation...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.